Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 10;10:585297. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.585297

Table 2.

Summary of the meta-analysis results.

Analysis N References Random-effects model Fixed-effects model Heterogeneity
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P I2 Ph
OS 7 (9, 10, 12, 1417) 2.24 (1.50, 3.35) 0 1.70 (1.43, 2.03) 0 63.3% 0.012
Subgroup 1: sample size ≥ 200 2 (9, 15) 1.92 (0.95, 3.88) 0.07 2.30 (1.62, 3.26) 0 82.1% 0.018
Sample size ≥ 200 5 (10, 12, 14, 16, 17) 2.56 (1.51, 4.32) 0 1.54 (1.26, 1.89) 0 42.5% 0.138
Subgroup 2: univariate analysis 3 (9, 14, 16) 3.11 (2.01, 4.80) 0 3.11 (2.01, 4.80) 0 0.0% 0.692
Multivariate analysis 4 (10, 12, 15, 17) 1.83 (1.19, 2.82) 0.006 1.52 (1.25, 1.84) 0 56.2% 0.077
Subgroup 3: solid tumor 5 (10, 14, 15, 16, 17) 2.43 (1.31, 4.68) 0.005 1.63 (1.33, 1.99) 0 67.9% 0.014
Hematological tumor 2 (9, 12) 2.05 (1.08, 3.90) 0.028 2.00 (1.38, 2.90) 0 66.2% 0.085
Subgroup 4: medium age at diagnosis ≥ 60 4 (12, 14, 16, 17) 2.61 (1.36, 5.01) 0.004 2.28 (1.58, 3.29) 0 56.7% 0.074
Medium age at diagnosis ≥60 2 (10, 15) 1.43 (1.15, 1.77) 0.001 1.43 (1.15, 1.77) 0.001 0.0% 0.332
PFS 2 (11, 16) 3.90 (2.33, 6.52) 0 3.90 (2.33, 6.52) 0 0.0% 0.601

N, number of studies; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Ph, P values of Q test; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival.