Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;10:405. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01089-6

Table 2.

Relationships between gamma oscillatory biomarkers and TCT-related change in cognitive and clinical outcomes.

TCT R2 TAU R2 ASSR × treatment interaction
ΔR2 β SE t p
Baseline gamma power
Δ MCCB-NC 0.31 0.06 0.16 0.40 0.15 2.64 0.012
Δ SANS composite 0.03 0.01 0.02 –0.15 0.17 –0.87 0.390
Δ SAPS composite 0.16 0.00 0.00 –0.06 0.16 –0.39 0.699
Baseline gamma phase-locking
Δ MCCB-NC 0.15 0.05 0.08 0.30 0.16 1.83 0.075
Δ SANS composite 0.02 0.01 0.01 –0.13 0.18 –0.73 0.473
Δ SAPS composite 0.09 0.02 0.00 –0.06 0.16 –0.38 0.703
1-h Δ Gamma power
Δ MCCB-NC 0.19 0.01 0.07 –0.26 0.16 –1.62 0.115
Δ SANS composite 0.30 0.04 0.15 –0.39 0.15 –2.53 0.016
Δ SAPS composite 0.40 0.04 0.14 0.38 0.15 2.59 0.014
1-h Δ Gamma phase locking
Δ MCCB-NC 0.00 0.06 0.02 0.14 0.17 0.86 0.396
Δ SANS composite 0.20 0.15 0.00 –0.03 0.16 –0.16 0.871
Δ SAPS composite 0.20 0.24 0.24 0.50 0.14 3.52 0.001

The primary analysis focused on elucidating significant ASSR biomarker × treatment interactions on TCT-related change in cognitive and clinical outcomes using linear regressions. To further clarify any significant interactions, R2 values are also provided for linear regressions run in TCT and TAU groups, separately.