Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;10:20405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77175-y

Table 1.

[3H]CP55,940 displacement from hCB1R or hCB2R CHO cell membranes.

Compound hCB1R hCB2R
Ki (nM) Emin (%) Ki (nM) Emin (%)
CP55,940 13 (5.6–33) 0.0 ± 5.2 29 (13–67) 0.0 ± 6.2
9-THC 36 (17–62) 10 ± 3.5 31 (15–62) 7.4 ± 4.4
9-THCa 620 (180–970)*^ 67 ± 11*^ 1.3 (0.33–6.3)*^† 49 ± 7.2*^
THCV 22 (5.0–140) 54 ± 4.1*^ 47 (21–270) 27 ± 9.5
CBD 200 (140–370)^ 65 ± 11*^ 240 (24–560) 54 ± 9.3*^
CBDa > 10,000 96 ± 6.5*^ 12 (4.9–77) 30 ± 7.8
CBDV > 10,000 96 ± 5.1*^ 140 (96–280)*^ 22 ± 9.3
CBG 1300 (520–8400)*^ 49 ± 7.2*^ 490 (130–2500)*^ 32 ± 8.1
CBC 11 (1.9–91) 55 ± 3.7*^ 27 (8.9–83) 9.7 ± 5.9

Compound activity was quantified for [3H]CP55,940 binding in CHO cells stably expressing hCB1R or hCB2R and treated with compounds. Data were fit to a variable slope (4 parameter) non-linear regression in GraphPad (v. 8). n ≥ 6 independent experiments performed in duplicate. EMin refers to the bottom of the concentration–response curve. Data are expressed as nM with 95% CI or %CP55,940 response, mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to CP55,940 within receptor; ^p < 0.05 compared to ∆9-THC within receptor; †p < 0.05 between receptors; as determined via non-overlapping 95% CI or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. Corresponding graphs are presented in Figs. 2 and 5.