Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;10:20405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77175-y

Table 3.

hCB1R- or hCB2R-dependent recruitment of βarrestin2.

Compound hCB1R hCB2R
EC50 (nM) Emax (%) EC50 (nM) Emax (%)
CP55,940 920 (700–1200) 100 ± 5.6 560 (410–760) 100 ± 3.4
9-THC > 10,000 37 ± 7.5* 94 (78–210)* 46 ± 4.9*
9-THCa > 10,000 4.1 ± 1.5*^ > 10,000 15 ± 2.5*^
THCV > 10,000 0.05 ± 2.1*^  > 10,000 50 ± 6.8*
CBD > 10,000 1.0 ± 1.6*^ 58 (44–74)*^ 23 ± 2.8*
CBDa > 10,000 0.10 ± 0.11*^ > 10,000 18 ± 2.5*^
CBDV > 10,000 0.96 ± 0.75*^ > 10,000 64 ± 13*
CBG > 10,000 0.41 ± 0.45*^ > 10,000 22 ± 1.2*^
CBC > 10,000 6.9 ± 0.96*^ > 10,000 12 ± 2.8*^

hCB1R-or hCB2R-dependent recruitment of βarrestin2 was quantified in PathHunter CHO cells stably expressing hCB1R or hCB2R and treated with compounds for 90 min. Data were fit to a variable slope (4 parameter) non-linear regression in GraphPad (v. 8). n ≥ 6 independent experiments performed in triplicate. EMax refers to the top of the concentration–response curve. Data are expressed as nM with 95% CI or %CP55,940 response, mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 compared to CP55,940; ^p < 0.05 compared to ∆9-THC within assay and measurement; †p < 0.05 compared to hCB1R within compound; as determined via non-overlapping 95% CI or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. Corresponding graphs are presented in Figs. 4 and 7.