TABLE 4.
Orthogonal experimental design and results of CEM
| No. | A: CEM liquid material ratio (ml/g) | B: CEM cellulase concentration (%) | C: CEM time (hr) | SDF yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 2 | 25 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 |
| 3 | 25 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 4.3 |
| 4 | 30 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.4 |
| 5 | 30 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5.7 |
| 6 | 30 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 4.5 |
| 7 | 35 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| 8 | 35 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.8 |
| 9 | 35 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 5.5 |
| k 1 | 3.533 | 3.133 | 4.033 | |
| k 2 | 4.533 | 4.667 | 4.133 | |
| k 3 | 4.500 | 4.767 | 4.400 | |
| Range | 1.000 | 1.634 | 0.367 | |
| Important order | B > A>C | |||
| Optimal combination | A2B3C3 | |||
CEM, cellulase modification; SDF, soluble dietary fiber.