Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;3:83. Originally published 2020 Nov 12. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13144.2

Table 1. PICOS criteria for the ABI economic review.

Criteria Inclusion Exclusion
Population The population of interest will be individuals over 18 years old who have
a mild, moderate, and/or severe type of acquired brain injury
The term acquired brain injury (ABI): describes any injury sustained to the
brain since birth. The Royal College of Physicians 30 have defined ABI as an
inclusive category of injuries that embraces acute (rapid onset) brain injury
of any cause, including:
    -  trauma due to having a head injury (traumatic brain injury, TBI), or
    -  vascular accident (sub-arachnoid haemorrhage or stroke),
    -  metabolic or toxic insult (e.g. hypoglycaemia)
    -  post-surgical damage (e.g. following a brain tumour removal),
    -  cerebral anoxia,
    -  other inflammation (e.g. vasculitis), or
    -  infection (e.g. encephalitis, meningitis)
Commonly, brain injuries can be sustained traumatically (TBI) following:
    -  motor vehicle or road traffic accidents,
    -  falls, or
    -  assaults,
or, according to 31 can be the result of a non-traumatic cause, such as :
    -  stroke,
    -  brain illness or tumor,
    -  among other conditions
There will be no restrictions on ABI participant characteristics such as age,
gender, severity of acquired brain injury, study setting or country.
Interventions involving only children aged
under 18 years of age will be excluded,
due to the brain not being fully mature
before this age, therefore being unable
to rule out natural development versus
recovery.
Populations with mild cognitive
impairment or other neurological
disorders not related to ABI (i.e.
dementia), will be excluded.
Interventions Non-pharmacological rehabilitation intervention for people with an ABI
(e.g., any treatment not involving drugs)
Pharmacological interventions that involve
the consumption of a substance (including
drugs, food supplements, herbal
medicines, vitamins and homeopathic
remedies.
Comparators Usual care (UC) or treatment as usual (TAU). Interventions that did not state a
comparator intervention.
Outcomes Patients:
-Cost outcomes: Costs from healthcare and/or societal perspective;
intervention costs; productivity loss costs due morbidity and mortality
-Health outcomes: Health related quality of life (HQOL) measured as
quality adjusted life years (QALY) by any instrument (e.g.: SF-6D or EQ-5D)
or quality of life (QOL) measured by any instrument and disease specific
health outcomes such as: days of institutionalized delayed, time to care
home admission, hospital admission, etc.
Care givers:
-Cost outcomes: Heath-related cost or, productivity loss due to caregiving
-Health outcomes: HQOL or QOL or psychosocial measures of caregiver
burden etc.
Results:
-Net monetary benefit (NMB)
-Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
-Net health benefit (NHB)
Other than listed under inclusion criteria.
Study designs Cost-effectiveness analysis (e.g., cost per life year gained), cost-benefit
and cost minimization analyses in which the designs were randomised
controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT studies, cost-utility analyses (e.g., cost per
quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained or cost per disability-adjusted life
year averted), cohort studies, and modeling studies.
Cost of illness studies (Col), editorials or
other descriptive studies (e.g., protocols,
single case reports) will be excluded.
General Studies conducted anywhere in the world will be included, but only English
language sources will be consulted. No date restrictions will be applied:
sources will be searched from inception up to 24 th August 2020.
Non-English language studies