Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 23;20:83. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00358-3

Table 2.

Performance of different predictive models

Models Training cohort Validation cohort
AUC (95% CI) ACC SPE SEN AUC (95% CI) ACC SPE SEN
Radiomic nomogram 0.745 (0.696–0.795) 0.716 0.659 0.765 0.758 (0.685–0.831) 0.673 0.514 0.793
Combined radiomic signature 0.715 (0.663–0.767) 0.671 0.757 0.598 0.714 (0.636–0.792) 0.642 0.743 0.565
Tumor-based model 0.714 (0.662–0.766) 0.663 0.827 0.525 0.715 (0.637–0.792) 0.630 0.800 0.500
Peripheral ring-based model 0.660 (0.605–0.714) 0.629 0.740 0.534 0.659 (0.576–0.741) 0.617 0.729 0.533
Clinical model 1 (CTT + CTN) 0.622 (0.566–0.678) 0.589 0.694 0.500 0.586 (0.498–0.674) 0.574 0.586 0.565
Clinical model 2 (age + CTT + CTN) 0.663 (0.608–0.718) 0.623 0.711 0.549 0.605 (0.518–0.692) 0.574 0.586 0.565

NOTE. Abbreviations: AUC Area under the curve, CI Confidence interval, ACC Accuracy, SPE Specificity, SEN Sensitivity, CTT CT T stage, CTN CT N stage