Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;11(1):1818965. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1818965

Table 5.

Between-class differences in childhood trauma variables (N = 543)a.

  Class 1 PTSD
Class 2 CPTSD
Class 3 DSO
Class 4 Low
         
Variable
(n = 181)
(n = 135)
(n = 93)
(n = 134)
H2
df
p
ESE
Significant post-hoc comparisons
CTQ severity                  
 Abuse 1.59 (0.57) 1.82 (0.69) 1.58 (0.53) 1.30 (0.29) 58.24 3 < .001*** .107 2 > 1
1, 2, 3 > 4
 Neglect 1.70 (0.62) 1.91 (0.66) 1.85 (0.60) 1.48 (0.52) 46.28 3 < .001*** .085 2 > 1
1, 2, 3 > 4
CTQ subscale severity                  
 Emotional abuse 1.94 (0.88) 2.30 (0.97) 2.01 (0.86) 1.51 (0.50) 57.38 3 < .001*** .106 2 > 1
1, 2, 3 > 4
 Physical abuse 1.42 (0.61) 1.56 (0.78) 1.40 (0.51) 1.25 (0.32) 10.40 3 .015* .019 2 > 4
 Sexual abuse 1.40 (0.88) 1.61 (1.04) 1.29 (0.70) 1.13 (0.42) 26.67 3 < .001*** .049 2 > 3
1, 2 > 4
 Emotional neglect 1.94 (0.80) 2.27 (0.84) 2.50 (0.87) 1.67 (0.72) 53.02 3 < .001*** .098 1, 2, 3 > 4
2, 3 > 1
 Physical neglect 1.47 (0.56) 1.56 (0.63) 1.44 (0.48) 1.30 (0.42) 15.77 3 .001** .029 1, 2 > 4
CTQ subscale endorsement         53.51 12 < .001*** .181  
 None 101 (0.56) 54 (0.40) 51 (0.55) 104 (0.78)         1 > 2
4 > 1, 2, 3
 1 34 (0.19) 38 (0.28) 16 (0.17) 19 (0.14)         2 > 4
 2 27 (0.15) 16 (0.12) 12 (0.13) 8 (0.06)          
 3 11 (0.06) 12 (0.09) 10 (0.11) 2 (0.02)         2, 3 > 4
 ≥ 4 8 (0.04) 15 (0.11) 4 (0.04) 1 (< 0.01)         2 > 4

For CTQ severity and CTQ subscale severity, means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. For CTQ subscale endorsement, raw numbers are presented with column percentages in parentheses.

PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; CPTSD, complex post-traumatic stress disorder; DSO, disturbances in self-organization; ESE, effect size estimate; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.

ESE was calculated using epsilon squared (ε2) for Kruskal–Wallis H tests and Cramer’s V for chi-squared tests of independence. For Significant post-hoc comparisons, numbers represent class labels. Bonferroni correction was used for all comparisons.

an = 33 participants were excluded for extreme minimization/denial.

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.