Table 5.
Class 1 PTSD |
Class 2 CPTSD |
Class 3 DSO |
Class 4 Low |
||||||
Variable |
(n = 181) |
(n = 135) |
(n = 93) |
(n = 134) |
H/χ2 |
df |
p |
ESE |
Significant post-hoc comparisons |
CTQ severity | |||||||||
Abuse | 1.59 (0.57) | 1.82 (0.69) | 1.58 (0.53) | 1.30 (0.29) | 58.24 | 3 | < .001*** | .107 | 2 > 1 1, 2, 3 > 4 |
Neglect | 1.70 (0.62) | 1.91 (0.66) | 1.85 (0.60) | 1.48 (0.52) | 46.28 | 3 | < .001*** | .085 | 2 > 1 1, 2, 3 > 4 |
CTQ subscale severity | |||||||||
Emotional abuse | 1.94 (0.88) | 2.30 (0.97) | 2.01 (0.86) | 1.51 (0.50) | 57.38 | 3 | < .001*** | .106 | 2 > 1 1, 2, 3 > 4 |
Physical abuse | 1.42 (0.61) | 1.56 (0.78) | 1.40 (0.51) | 1.25 (0.32) | 10.40 | 3 | .015* | .019 | 2 > 4 |
Sexual abuse | 1.40 (0.88) | 1.61 (1.04) | 1.29 (0.70) | 1.13 (0.42) | 26.67 | 3 | < .001*** | .049 | 2 > 3 1, 2 > 4 |
Emotional neglect | 1.94 (0.80) | 2.27 (0.84) | 2.50 (0.87) | 1.67 (0.72) | 53.02 | 3 | < .001*** | .098 | 1, 2, 3 > 4 2, 3 > 1 |
Physical neglect | 1.47 (0.56) | 1.56 (0.63) | 1.44 (0.48) | 1.30 (0.42) | 15.77 | 3 | .001** | .029 | 1, 2 > 4 |
CTQ subscale endorsement | 53.51 | 12 | < .001*** | .181 | |||||
None | 101 (0.56) | 54 (0.40) | 51 (0.55) | 104 (0.78) | 1 > 2 4 > 1, 2, 3 |
||||
1 | 34 (0.19) | 38 (0.28) | 16 (0.17) | 19 (0.14) | 2 > 4 | ||||
2 | 27 (0.15) | 16 (0.12) | 12 (0.13) | 8 (0.06) | |||||
3 | 11 (0.06) | 12 (0.09) | 10 (0.11) | 2 (0.02) | 2, 3 > 4 | ||||
≥ 4 | 8 (0.04) | 15 (0.11) | 4 (0.04) | 1 (< 0.01) | 2 > 4 |
For CTQ severity and CTQ subscale severity, means are presented with standard deviations in parentheses. For CTQ subscale endorsement, raw numbers are presented with column percentages in parentheses.
PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder; CPTSD, complex post-traumatic stress disorder; DSO, disturbances in self-organization; ESE, effect size estimate; CTQ, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire.
ESE was calculated using epsilon squared (ε2) for Kruskal–Wallis H tests and Cramer’s V for chi-squared tests of independence. For Significant post-hoc comparisons, numbers represent class labels. Bonferroni correction was used for all comparisons.
an = 33 participants were excluded for extreme minimization/denial.
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.