Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 15;2020:2196207. doi: 10.1155/2020/2196207

Table 4.

Antioxidant defense and oxidative stress biomarkers in liver homogenate.

CG VG QG CSG QCSG
SOD (U/mg protein) 90.74 ± 4.72 88.01 ± 5.0 93.26 ± 5.42 115.4 ± 5.85a,b,c 81.42 ± 5.36d
CAT (U/mg protein) 0.28 ± 0.02 0.20 ± 0.03 0.22 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.03a 0.14 ± 0.02a
GSH/GSSG ratio 7.21 (2.59; 13.30) 5.84 (4.11; 6.85) 6.05 (5.24; 9.04) 0.41 (0.34; 1.40)c 6.61 (3.19; 10.64)d
TBARS (nmol/mg protein) 0.34 ± 0.02 0.24 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.02 2.07 ± 0.50a,b,c 0.27 ± 0.04d
Protein carbonyl (nmol/ng protein) 12.73 ± 1.28 13.13 ± 1.90 16.07 ± 2.05 16.18 ± 0.93 14.12 ± 1.58

CG: control group; VG: vehicle group; QG: quercetin group; CSG: cigarette smoke group; QCSG: quercetin and cigarette smoke group, SOD: superoxide dismutase; CAT: catalase; GSH: glutathione sulfide; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; TBARS: thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. a represents a significant difference between groups when compared to CG; b represents a significant difference between groups when compared to VG; c represents a significant difference between groups when compared to QG; d represents a significant difference between groups when compared to CSG. SOD, CAT, TBARS, and protein carbonyl were expressed as mean ± standarderrorofthemean and were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's posttest, n = 5 − 8 animals per group (p < 0.05). The GSH/GSSG ratio data were expressed in median, minimum, and maximum value and were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn's posttest that was used, n = 5 − 8 animals per group (p < 0.05).