TABLE 3.
MR analysis results using different methods.
| 95% CI | 95% CI | ||||
| MR method | β | SE | (Down) | (Up) | P value |
| Simple median | 0.183 | 0.223 | –0.254 | 0.62 | 0.412 |
| Weighted median | 0.249 | 0.19 | –0.124 | 0.622 | 0.19 |
| Penalized weighted median | 0.25 | 0.191 | –0.123 | 0.624 | 0.189 |
| IVW | 0.096 | 0.142 | –0.182 | 0.375 | 0.499 |
| Penalized IVW | 0.096 | 0.142 | –0.182 | 0.375 | 0.499 |
| Robust IVW | 0.243 | 0.078 | 0.089 | 0.396 | 0.002 |
| Penalized robust IVW | 0.243 | 0.078 | 0.089 | 0.396 | 0.002 |
| MR-Egger | 0.224 | 0.268 | –0.302 | 0.75 | 0.404 |
| Penalized MR-Egger | 0.224 | 0.268 | –0.302 | 0.75 | 0.404 |
| Robust MR-Egger | 0.256 | 0.091 | 0.076 | 0.435 | 0.005 |
| Penalized robust MR-Egger | 0.256 | 0.091 | 0.076 | 0.435 | 0.005 |
MR, Mendelian randomization; IVW, inverse-variance weighted; β, regression coefficient; SE, standard error; and CI, confidence interval. Significance level 0.05.