Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;20:398. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01517-3

Table 2.

Prevalence of different lesions according to the per-protocol analysis

Pathological diagnosis Cases N (%) High-risk areas N (%) Non-high-risk areas N (%) P value
All subjects under endoscopy 37,922 26,633 11,289
Esophagus
 Esophagitis 4349 (11.5) 4173 (15.7) 176 (1.6) < 0.001
 Mild/moderate dysplasia, or dysplasia, NOS 1692 (4.5) 1600 (6.0) 92 (0.8) < 0.001
 Severe dysplasia/EC in situ 195 (0.5) 187 (0.7) 8 (0.1) < 0.001
 EC 59 (0.2) 52 (0.2) 7 (0.1) 0.003
Positive esophageal lesions 254 (0.7) 239 (0.9) 15 (0.1) < 0.001
Stomach
 Atrophic gastritis 5522 (14.6) 5132 (19.3) 390 (3.5) < 0.001
 Intestinal metaplasia/low-grade dysplasia 2977 (7.9) 2257 (8.5) 720 (6.4) < 0.001
 High-grade dysplasia 117 (0.3) 105 (0.4) 12 (0.1) < 0.001
 GC 167 (0.4) 143 (0.5) 24 (0.2) < 0.001
Positive stomach lesions 284 (0.8) 248 (0.9) 36 (0.3) < 0.001
Positive cases in totala 528 (1.4) 478 (1.8) 50 (0.4) < 0.001

aTen positive cases had advanced lesions both at esophageal and stomach site