Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 3;60(11):5395–5406. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00456

Table 2. Relative Free-Energy Differences ΔFi≠1,1 between the Ligand End States for the Three Different Acceleration σ-Levels for System GRA2a.

  ΔFi≠1,1 unbound ligand
ΔFi≠1,1 two bound ligands
calculated ΔΔFi≠1,1
 
ΔF2,1 –111.2 ± 0.3 –111.0 ± 0.2 –110.8 ± 0.1 n.a. –224.4 ± 1.6 –231.4 ± 1.2 n.a. –2.4 ± 1.7 –9.8 ± 1.0
ΔF3,1 22.6 ± 0.2 22.5 ± 0.2 22.4 ± 0.1 n.a. 45.5 ± 1.5 39.6 ± 1.4 n.a. 0.5 ± 1.5 –5.3 ± 1.2
ΔF4,1 8.9 ± 0.2 8.6 ± 0.1 8.7 ± 0.1 n.a. 7.3 ± 1.7 24.8 ± 2.3 n.a. –9.9 ± 1.7 7.5 ± 2.1
ΔF5,1 –53.6 ± 0.3 –54.3 ± 0.2 –54.4 ± 0.1 n.a. –116.5 ± 1.5 –118.0 ± 0.6 n.a. –7.8 ± 1.6 –9.3 ± 0.4
ΔF6,1 –90.6 ± 0.3 –90.9 ± 0.2 –90.7 ± 0.1 n.a. –187.5 ± 1.6 –197.0 ± 1.3 n.a. –5.6 ± 1.6 –15.6 ± 1.1
ΔF7,1 –104.3 ± 0.2 –104.8 ± 0.2 –104.5 ± 0.1 n.a. –218.1 ± 1.7 –207.1 ± 1.8 n.a. –8.6 ± 1.7 2.0 ± 1.6
ΔF8,1 –135.0 ± 0.2 –135.7 ± 0.2 –135.8 ± 0.1 n.a. –289.5 ± 1.6 –292.5 ± 1.3 n.a. –18.1 ± 1.6 –20.9 ± 1.1
ΔF9,1 60.3 ± 0.3 60.5 ± 0.2 60.5 ± 0.1 n.a. 108.8 ± 1.5 124.8 ± 1.9 n.a. –12.2 ± 1.6 3.9 ± 1.7
ΔF10,1 –73.0 ± 0.3 –73.4 ± 0.2 –73.3 ± 0.1 n.a. –162.6 ± 1.5 –160.0 ± 1.4 n.a. –15.8 ± 1.6 –13.3 ± 1.2
ΔF11,1 –47.8 ± 0.3 –48.0 ± 0.2 –48.2 ± 0.1 n.a. –117.2 ± 1.5 –94.3 ± 1.4 n.a. –21.1 ± 1.6 2.1 ± 1.2
ΔF12,1 –55.3 ± 0.4 –54.9 ± 0.2 –54.8 ± 0.2 n.a. –123.3 ± 1.6 –113.1 ± 1.9 n.a. –13.5 ± 1.6 –3.6 ± 1.5
ΔF13,1 –156.0 ± 0.3 –157.0 ± 0.2 –156.9 ± 0.1 n.a. –340.2 ± 1.6 –338.5 ± 1.5 n.a. –26.2 ± 1.7 –24.8 ± 1.3
ΔF14,1 –130.8 ± 0.3 –131.6 ± 0.2 –131.6 ± 0.1 n.a. –286.9 ± 1.6 –270.5 ± 1.7 n.a. –23.7 ± 1.6 –7.4 ± 1.5
ΔF15,1 –38.0 ± 0.5 –37.7 ± 0.2 –37.7 ± 0.1 n.a. –102.3 ± 1.7 –79.1 ± 2.5 n.a. –27.0 ± 1.7 –3.7 ± 2.3
ΔF16,1 –123.1 ± 0.4 –123.2 ± 0.2 –123.3 ± 0.2 n.a. –277.7 ± 2.1 –260.3 ± 2.4 n.a. –31.2 ± 2.1 –13.6 ± 2.0
a

Energy units are kilojoules per mole. n.a. = not available.