Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 15;65(10):2460–2484. doi: 10.1002/lno.11464

Table 2.

Summer physical variables for the Great Lakes based on data collected during summer surveys from 1996 to 2017, including average site depth for all profiles analyzed, thermal structure (epilimnion, thermocline, and hypolimnion), maximum relative thermal resistance to mixing (RTRM), maximum thermal gradient, and the 1% PAR depth (daytime profiles only). Values shown are the mean ± one standard deviation.

n profiles Thermocline present (%) Site depth (m) Epilimnion depth (m) Thermocline depth (m) Hypolimnion depth (m) RTRM Thermal gradient (°C m−1) 1% PAR depth (m)
Superior 473 99 169 ± 54 12.5 ± 5.3 17.2 ± 8.6 33.7 ± 13.2 22.9 ± 21.8 −1.7 ± 1.1 35.6 ± 8.9
Huron 359 100 82 ± 27 11.9 ± 3.7 16.7 ± 5.7 35.1 ± 9.3 49.8 ± 33.2 −2.6 ± 1.2 39.8 ± 10.0
Michigan 388 100 109 ± 58 11.9 ± 4.5 16.5 ± 5.5 34.8 ± 9.2 54.7 ± 51.1 −2.6 ± 1.2 31.9 ± 8.2
Northern 226 100 116 ± 70 11.8 ± 4.8 16.8 ± 6.4 34.5 ± 10.3 47.4 ± 49.8 −2.3 ± 1.0 29.9 ± 6.4
Southern 162 100 99 ± 34 12.0 ± 4.1 16.0 ± 4.0 35.2 ± 7.7 60.9 ± 51.6 −3.0 ± 1.2 33.9 ± 9.3
Ontario 229 99 99 ± 47 11.5 ± 4.7 14.7 ± 5.5 33.1 ± 10.5 49.8 ± 33.2 −2.7 ± 1.3 20.8 ± 5.5
Western 112 100 102 ± 33 9.5 ± 3.7 11.9 ± 4.5 28.5 ± 7.2 56.4 ± 37.3 −2.9 ± 1.4 21.8 ± 6.1
Central 117 97 95 ± 57 12.9 ± 4.9 17.5 ± 4.9 38.1 ± 11.2 44.4 ± 28.4 −2.6 ± 1.3 20.0 ± 4.9
Erie 459 81 24 ± 13 12.7 ± 4.2 15.6 ± 4.7 20.7 ± 7.2 76.6 ± 62.9 −4.0 ± 3.0 16.1 ± 6.9
Western 135 35 10 ± 1 5.5 ± 1.7 5.9 ± 1.7 5.7 ± 1.1 17.0 ± 35.3 0.3 ± 0.5 7.5 ± 3.4
Central 217 100 23 ± 1 13.2 ± 3.1 16.0 ± 2.3 17.7 ± 2.1 110.0 ± 54.3 −6.2 ± 2.0 18.2 ± 3.8
Eastern 107 100 45 ± 9 14.4 ± 4.2 18.9 ± 3.6 29.0 ± 4.9 72.6 ± 51.4 −4.3 ± 1.9 22.1 ± 5.6