Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 8;25(11):1160–1166. doi: 10.1111/resp.13816

Table 3.

Associations between change in QCT‐measured outcomes and change in clinical response variables

Lobar RV change Lobar TLC change
Parameter Treated lobes Untreated lobes Total lung Treated lobes Untreated lobes Total lung
Change in RV (n = 78) 0.380 (0.001) −0.168 (0.142) 0.165 (0.148) 0.322 (0.004) −0.250 (0.027) 0.049 (0.670)
Change in FEV1 (n = 78) −0.706 (<0.001) 0.088 (0.442) −0.446 (<0.001) −0.454 (<0.001) 0.481 (<0.001) −0.042 (0.712)
Change in SGRQ (n = 78) 0.167 (0.144) −0.256 (0.023) −0.041 (0.724) 0.169 (0.140) −0.426 (<0.001) −0.231 (0.042)
Change in 6MWD (n = 77) −0.232 (0.042) 0.005 (0.966) −0.162 (0.160) −0.111 (0.338) 0.168 (0.145) 0.055 (0.636)
Change in lobar TLC (n = 77) Treated lobes 0.647 (<0.001) −0.336 (0.003) 0.242 (0.033)
Untreated lobes −0.212 (0.062) 0.364 (0.001) 0.142 (0.216)
All lobes 0.327 (0.004) −0.012 (0.915) 0.260 (0.022)

Data are presented as Pearson correlation coefficient (P‐value). Significant P‐values are depicted in bold.

6MWD, 6‐min walk distance; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; QCT, quantitative computed tomography; RV, residual volume; SGRQ, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire; TLC, total lung capacity.