Table 4.
Genetic diversity indices of 25 microsatellite markers in 11 populations of sheep in India (See Fig. 1 for the location of each population).
Region | Sheep breed | Total alleles | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He | uHe | F | Ar |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NT | Rampur Bushair | 228 | 9.12 | 4.49 | 1.66 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.11* | 7.21 |
Poonchi | 214 | 8.56 | 4.54 | 1.69 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | − 0.01 | 7.35 | |
Changthangi | 219 | 8.76 | 4.52 | 1.64 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.06* | 7.28 | |
ET | Bonpala | 149 | 5.96 | 2.99 | 1.24 | 0.64 | 0.63 | 0.64 | − 0.02 | 4.84 |
Tibetan | 149 | 5.96 | 3.92 | 1.42 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.23* | 5.82 | |
Shahbadi | 223 | 8.92 | 4.72 | 1.68 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.13* | 7.23 | |
Balangir | 205 | 8.2 | 4.22 | 1.55 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.09* | 6.55 | |
SP | Kenguri | 228 | 9.12 | 4.46 | 1.61 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.07* | 6.99 |
Bandur | 218 | 8.72 | 3.75 | 1.49 | 0.61 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.11* | 6.58 | |
Hassan | 217 | 8.68 | 4.23 | 1.59 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.04* | 6.88 | |
Bellary | 224 | 8.96 | 4.49 | 1.64 | 0.65 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.10* | 7.07 | |
Mean | 206.73 | 8.27 | 4.21 | 1.56 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.08* | 9.31 | |
SE | 8.42 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.53 |
Na = Number of alleles; Ne = Number of effective alleles; I = Shannon’s information index; Ho = Observed heterozygosity; He = Expected heterozygosity; uHe = Unbiased expected heterozygosity; F = Heterozygote deficiency (inbreeding coefficient); Ar = Allelic richness. *P < 0.05.