Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Sex Transm Dis. 2019 Apr;46(4):221–228. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000965

Table 3:

Correlates of current PrEP use (N=850)a

Using PrEP Unadjusted associations Adjusted associations
Base modelb Exploratory modelc
n % OR (95% CI) p-value aOR (95% CI) p-value aOR (95% CI) p-value
A priori covariates
Region of residence <0.001 0.260 0.676
 King County 123 25.2% Reference Reference Reference
 Other western Washington 32 13.4% 0.46 (0.30, 0.70) 0.67 (0.41, 1.09) 0.80 (0.45, 1.44)
 Eastern Washington 18 14.5% 0.50 (0.29, 0.86) 0.82 (0.44, 1.53) 1.13 (0.53, 2.42)
Age <0.001 <0.001 0.043
 16 to 24 18 7.2% Reference Reference Reference
 25 to 34 70 25.4% 4.36 (2.51, 7.57) 3.97 (2.19, 7.18) 2.99 (1.43, 6.25)
 35 to 44 44 33.1% 6.34 (3.48, 11.57) 5.23 (2.66, 10.27) 3.09 (1.33, 7.23)
 45 to 54 29 28.7% 5.17 (2.71, 9.85) 4.17 (2.03, 8.57) 3.34 (1.32, 8.41)
 55 and older 12 13.2% 1.95 (0.90, 4.23) 2.06 (0.87, 4.88) 2.31 (0.83, 6.41)
Race/ethnicity 0.717 0.784 0.858
 Non-Hispanic white 125 21.3% Reference Reference Reference
 Hispanic 26 17.4% 0.78 (0.49, 1.25) 0.76 (0.45, 1.29) 0.96 (0.50, 1.84)
 Non-Hispanic black 7 21.9% 1.03 (0.44, 2.45) 0.86 (0.32, 2.33) 0.60 (0.19, 1.91)
 Non-Hispanic other 15 18.3% 0.83 (0.46, 1.50) 0.95 (0.47, 1.90) 0.98 (0.44, 2.17)
Gay/homosexual identity 160 22.3% 2.68 (1.47, 4.87) 0.001 1.90 (0.96, 3.75) 0.063 1.50 (0.67, 3.39) 0.326
Education <0.001 0.002 0.126
 High school or less 7 5.2% Reference Reference Reference
 Some college/vocational school 41 15.0% 3.23 (1.41, 7.41) 2.00 (0.82, 4.89) 1.50 (0.52, 4.33)
 4-year college or higher 125 28.3% 7.21 (3.28, 15.86) 3.66 (1.55, 8.66) 2.34 (0.83, 6.55)
Income <0.001 0.319 0.534
 Less than $15,000 7 7.1% Reference Reference Reference
 $15,000 to $29,999 13 12.6% 1.90 (0.72, 4.98) 2.07 (0.73, 5.86) 1.76 (0.53, 5.87)
 $30,000 to $49,999 34 23.1% 3.95 (1.68, 9.33) 2.80 (1.09, 7.14) 2.84 (0.98, 8.29)
 $50,000 to $99,999 59 22.8% 3.88 (1.71, 8.82) 2.37 (0.96, 5.86) 1.96 (0.68, 5.62)
 $100,000 or more 54 27.3% 4.93 (2.15, 11.30) 2.90 (1.13, 7.46) 1.84 (0.62, 5.50)
 I prefer not to answer 6 13.6% 2.08 (0.65, 6.58) 1.94 (0.54, 7.01) 1.77 (0.39, 8.12)
WA State PrEP guidelines category <0.001 <0.001
 Not indicated 13 4.1% Reference Reference
 Discussd 69 27.2% 8.81 (4.74, 16.37) 10.14 (5.31, 19.37)
 Recommende 91 33.0% 11.62 (6.32, 21.36) 13.91 (7.35, 26.34)
Exploratory covariates
Has health insurance 170 21.9% 6.74 (2.10, 21.67) 0.001 6.16 (1.57, 24.14) 0.009
Diagnosis with rectal gonorrhea or syphilis 27 41.5% 3.11 (1.84, 5.26) <0.001 3.35 (1.49, 7.49) 0.003
Anal sex role <0.001 0.364
 No anal sex 1 1.0% 0.03 (0.00, 0.24) 0.28 (0.03, 2.33)
 Exclusively bottom 20 12.1% 0.41 (0.21, 0.78) 0.74 (0.31, 1.74)
 Versatile 127 25.9% 1.04 (0.63, 1.70) 1.13 (0.58, 2.20)
 Exclusively top 25 25.3% Reference Reference
≥10 anal sex partners 83 60.6% 10.64 (7.08, 16.00) <0.001 2.99 (1.73, 5.14) <0.001
Current HIV-positive male partner 30 41.1% 3.09 (1.88, 5.10) <0.001 3.63 (1.52, 8.69) 0.004
CAS with a partner who was not main/primary or whose HIV status was positive or unknown 153 33.8% 9.61 (5.89, 15.69) <0.001 4.78 (2.63, 8.70) <0.001
Injection drug use 5 9.3% 0.38 (0.15, 0.97) 0.044 0.33 (0.09, 1.19) 0.092
Methamphetamine use 10 13.5% 0.59 (0.30, 1.17) 0.130
Poppers use 77 41.4% 4.18 (2.91, 6.01) <0.001 1.91 (1.17, 3.13) 0.010
History of exchange sex 1 3.1% 0.12 (0.02, 0.89) 0.038 0.32 (0.03, 3.02) 0.321
Perceived effectiveness of PrEP ≥90% 153 36.0% 11.39 (6.97, 18.61) <0.001 4.83 (2.62, 8.89) <0.001

Acronyms: OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CAS, condomless anal sex; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis

a

This analysis is restricted to respondents who have never or are currently using PrEP and provided responses to all covariates;

b

The base model includes only a priori covariates (region, age, education, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, income, and PrEP candidacy based on Washington state guidelines);

c

The exploratory model includes base model social and demographic variables and exploratory variables that were significant in biviariate analyses. The Washington state PrEP guideline category variable was not included in the exploratory model because it is derived from the specific HIV risk indicators included as exploratory covariates;

d

MSM who do not meet criteria for recommending PrEP and who reported CAS with a partner who is not main/primary, CAS with an HIV-positive or unknown status partner, diagnosis of urethral gonorrhea or rectal chlamydia, or injection drug use in the past 12 months, and those in ongoing sexual relationships with HIV-positive male partners who have been on ART ≥6 months and who are virologically suppressed;

e

MSM who reported a diagnosis of rectal gonorrhea or syphilis, use of methamphetamine or poppers, or history of exchange sex in the prior 12 months, and those in ongoing sexual relationships with HIV-positive male partners who are not on ART, on ART <6 months, or not virologically suppressed.