Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2020 Jun 10;231(1):e13512. doi: 10.1111/apha.13512

Table 3: Densitometric analysis of the expression of ENaC subunits in kidney cortex from nphs2Δipod *plg+/+and nphs2Δipod *plg−/−mice before and after induction of nephrotic syndrome and under treatment with aprotinin.

Signal intensity of the bands (relative units) was normalized for total protein expression of the respective lane.

uninduced nephrotic + placebo nephrotic + aprotinin
molecular weight, kDa nphs2Δipod*plg+/+ nphs2Δipod*plg−/− nphs2Δipod*plg+/+ nphs2Δipod*plg−/− nphs2Δipod*plg+/+ nphs2Δipod*plg−/−
α-ENaC 87 186 ± 16 252 ± 23 229 ± 40 237 ± 29 223 ± 58 183 ± 75
26 64 ± 12 90 ± 31 110 ± 11 98 ± 53 69 ± 3 95 ± 21
β-ENaC 85 8 ± 1 10 ± 1 8 ± 0.3 10 ± 1 11 ± 1 9 ± 1
γ-ENaC 84 178 ± 36 183 ± 45 142 ± 28 254 ± 37 284 ± 42 188 ± 23
72 110 ± 9 163 ± 55 187 ± 24# 141 ± 62 97 ± 13§ 133 ± 48

Arithmetic means of expression in relative units ± SEM (n=4 each)

#

significant difference between uninduced and nephrotic mice of the same genotype (t-test),

§

significant difference between placebo and aprotinin-treated nephrotic mice (t-test).