Table 2.

Comparisons between our method for the ”Flair/T1c/T2” combination and some state-of-the-art methods in terms of two evaluation metrics including dice score and sensitivity based on the BRATS 2017 dataset. In each case, we present mean ± standard deviation. N/A indicates that the measure is not provided in the literature.

Methods	Dice			Sensitivity
	ET	WT	TC	ET	WT	TC
Jesson Jesson and Arbel (2017)	0.71 ± 0.29	0.90 ± 0.07	0.75 ± 0.24	0.73 ± 0.29	0.90 ± 0.10	0.72 ± 0.26
Islam Islam and Ren (2017)	0.69 ± 0.30	0.88 ± 0.09	0.76 ± 0.76	0.72 ± 0.29	0.86 ± 0.14	0.71 ± 0.25
Shaikh Shaikh et al. (2017)	0.65 ± 0.32	0.87 ± 0.11	0.68 ± 0.34	N/A	N/A	N/A
Isensee Isensee et al. (2017)	0.73 ± N/A	0.90 ± N/A	0.80 ± N/A	0.79 ± N/A	0.90 ± N/A	0.78 ± N/A
Soltaninejad Soltaninejad et al. (2017)	0.66 ± 0.28	0.86 ± 0.09	0.78 ± 0.19	0.57 ± 0.28	0.83 ± 0.13	0.72 ± 0.21
our method	0.76 ± 0.28	0.89 ± 0.07	0.70 ± 0.33	0.78 ± 0.29	0.90 ± 0.11	0.68 ± 0.34