Abstract
The objective of this work was to characterize two Phytophthora palmivora isolates causing floral blight and rot in azalea plants and to evaluate the pathogenicity of this oomycete pathogen on several plant species. Azalea plants with symptoms of flower blight and rot were obtained in the municipality of Holambra-SP. After an attempt of isolation, colonies with Phytophthora characteristics grown only on selective V8 medium. Molecular identification of the isolates was done by amplification and sequencing of ITS and COX2 regions. In the phylogenetic analysis, the azalea isolates clustered with reference isolates of P. palmivora. Morphological characteristics were similar to those described for P. palmivora. Isolates were inoculated in healthy azalea plants and caused leaf blight and floral rot. The pathogen was re-isolated from symptomatic plants completing Koch’s postulates. In a host range test, the azalea isolates were able to cause lesions on leaves of vinca, snapdragon, basil, and tomato, and affected both leaves and flowers of geranium. Fruit rot was observed on tomato, potato, sweet pepper, scarlet eggplant, zucchini, cucumber, maroon cucumber, onion, apple, papaya, guava, and carrot. This is the first report of the species P. palmivora causing flower blight and rot in azalea plants in Brazil and probably in the world.
Keywords: Etiology, Ornamental plant, Pathogen host range, Rhododendron simsii
Introduction
In Brazil, the segment of flowers and ornamental plants was responsible for one amount of about U$ 7.0 billion in 2017 [1]. The Southeastern region leads the producing ranking in the country, and São Paulo is the main flower producer and market, with a participation of around 53% in national production [2]. In São Paulo State stands out the Holambra Count, that produces and exports its exceeding production to other Brazilian states.
Among the main species of ornamental plants produced and marketed in Brazil, there are some potted flowers such as chrysanthemum, orchids, kalanchoe, begonias, and azaleas [3]. Azaleas are plants of the Ericaceae family, originated from Southeast Asia, specifically China. These ornamental plant species are widespread in world because of its colorful flowers ranging from white, red, pink, and sometimes striped. They may be found in gardens and interior decoration in Brazil [4].
Several species of pathogens are associated with ornamental plants, causing diseases and economic losses, especially when they reach the aerial organs, which are the main tradable part in this industry. Plants belonging to the family Ericaceae, as the one from the genus Rhododendron, are affected by several species of Phytophthora [5–7]. Despite this, the oomycete Phytophthora palmivora [(Butler) Butler 1919)] has not yet been reported as a pathogen of azalea (Rhododendron simsii Planch.).
The species P. palmivora is a cosmopolitan plant pathogen that can survive in the soil for a long time and affects different plant tissues such as roots, stems, flowers, leaves, and fruits [5, 8]. This oomycete species presents a large number of hosts, including forest plants, ornamental, and fruit trees [5, 9, 10]. In Brazil, this pathogen has been reported causing diseases in dozens of host species, but it is not common on ornamental plants [11].
Traditionally, the identification of Phytophthora species have been based on morphological features of the reproductive and asexual structures and compared with taxonomic keys [5, 12]. In the last years, the advance in the use of molecular markers has optimized the identification of these species and allowed a better understanding of the evolutionary relations within the genus. Among the markers, the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region [13–15] or mitochondrial genes as cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COX2) [16, 17] are common for identification and phylogenetic analysis. The first comprehensive study of a wide range of species in the genus was reported by Cook et al. [18] using the ITS region to examine the phylogenetic relationship among 50 species. A total of eight primary clades were identified with two additional clades, 9 and 10. A phylogenetic study was conducted using several nuclear DNA loci, including the ITS region. In this study, the the genus Phytophthora was divided into ten different clades that, until today, are reference in phylogenetic studies within this genus [19]. More recently, in a work done by Martin et al. [20], 4 mitochondrial genes and 7 nuclear genes of 107 species provided 10 clades, almost identical to Blair et al.’s [19] study. In these works, it was possible to group the species according to the morphology of sporangia.
The objective of this work was to characterize two Phytophthora isolates causing a floral blight and rot in azalea and to evaluate the pathogenicity of this oomycete on several species of plants.
Material and methods
Pathogen isolates and their identification
Plants of azalea, imported from the municipality of Holambra-SP, presenting symptoms of flower blight and rot, were collected in a floriculture in Taguatinga-DF. For pathogen isolation, flower fragments with symptoms were superficially disinfested and deposited in potato dextrose agar media (PDA) + tetracycline (50 ppm) and selective V8 BARPN (benomyl, ampicillin, rifampicine, PCNB, and nystatin). Plates were maintained in a BOD incubator at 25 °C and 12 h of light for 3 days. After this incubation period, colonies with Phytophthora characteristics were only present in V8 selective medium. In this way, two isolates of the pathogen were collected from flowers of two different plants. For molecular identification of the Phytophthora species, DNA extraction of the two isolates was performed according to the method described by Mahuku [21]. Two genomic regions were chosen for this identification process, ITS using ITS4 (5′ TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC 3′) and ITS5 (5′ GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG 3′) primers for amplification of the ribosomal DNA ITS1, ITS2 and 5.8S regions and COX2 with primers cox2-F (5′ GGCAAATGGGTTTTCAAG ATCC 3′) e cox2-R (5′ CCATGATTAATACCACAAATTTCACTAAC 3′) [22].
The PCR product observed on gel was purified with a PureLink Quick Gel Extraction Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham–MA) and subjected to direct sequencing in Macrogen (South Korea). The ITS and COX2 sequences were compared to sequences available in GenBank and deposited in this database with the access numbers described in Table 1.
Table 1.
List of accessions from species of Phytophthora and Pythium used for the phylogenetic analysis of ITS and COX2 regions. Accessions identified as the same species are not obligatory from the same isolate
| Phythophthora species | Name of Isolate | Host | Location of origin | Genbank accession | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITS–rDNA | COX2 | ||||
| Phytophthora agathidicida | ICMP 19450 | New Zealand | KP295314 | ||
| Phytophthora alticola | CMW 19425 | South Africa | DQ988196 | ||
| Phytophthora andina | EC3363 | Ecuador | AY770741 | ||
| Phytophthora arenaria | CBS 125800 | Australia | HQ013215 | ||
| Phytophthora arenaria | CBS 127950 | Australia | HQ013219 | ||
| Phytophthora bisheria | P1.33 | USA | AF408625.2 | ||
| Phytophthora bisheria | CBS 25393 | Netherlands | DQ302411 | ||
| Phytophthora botryosa | IMI136915 | Hevea brasilensis | Malaysia | AF266784 | |
| Phytophthora botryosa | P6945 | Malaysia | HQ261507 | ||
| Phytophthora botryosa | P3425 | Malaysia | HQ261509 | ||
| Phytophthora cactorum | CH98PEC1 | AB217671 | |||
| Phytophthora cactorum | IMI296524 | Rubus idaeus | Wales | AF266772 | |
| Phytophthora capensis | P1822 | GU191219 | |||
| Phytophthora capsici | IFO30696 | AB217670 | |||
| Phytophthora capsici | IMI352321 | Piper nigrum | India | AF266787 | |
| Phytophthora castaneae | ICMP 19450 | Taiwan | KP295323 | ||
| Phytophthora castaneae | ICMP 18737 | Taiwan | KP295324 | ||
| Phytophthora citrophthora | IMI332632 | Actinidia chinensis | Chile | AF266785 | |
| Phytophthora citrophthora | CBS95087 | USA | HQ643205 | ||
| Phytophthora citrophthora | CBS111339 | South Korea | HQ643207 | ||
| Phytophthora clandestina | CLA2 | Australia | AJ131989 | ||
| Phytophthora cocois | ICMP 19685 | Cote d’Ivoire | KP295306 | ||
| Phytophthora colocasiae | IMI368918 | Colocasia esculenta | Malaysia | AF266786 | |
| Phytophthora elongata | VHS15078 | Australia | GQ847755 | ||
| Phytophthora frigida | CMW19435 | South Africa | DQ988177 | ||
| Phytophthora glovera | 11,091 | Brazil | AF279127.2 | ||
| Phytophthora glovera | 11,095 | Brazil | AF279128 | ||
| Phytophthora hedraiandra | CBS 111725 | AY707987 | |||
| Phytophthora heveae | IMI180616 | Hevea brasiliensis | Malaysia | AF266770 | |
| Phytophthora heveae | ICMP 19453 | USA | KP295301 | ||
| Phytophthora himalsilva | 44 | Nepal | HM752784 | ||
| Phytophthora idaei | IDA3 | AF266773 | |||
| Phytophthora ilicis | ILI1 (P590) | UK | AJ131990 | ||
| Phytophthora infestans | IMI66006 | Solanum tuberosum | Netherlands | AF266779 | |
| Phytophthora infestans | P12022 | Russia | HQ261588 | ||
| Phytophthora ipomoeae | Pic99165 | AY770742 | |||
| Phytophthora iranica | IRA1 (IMI158964) | Iran | AJ131987 | ||
| Phytophthora katsurae | IMI360596 | Cocos nucifera | Ivory Coast | AF266771 | |
| Phytophthora litchi | TARI 20250 | Taiwan | JQ814693 | ||
| Phytophthora meadii | Taiwan | AY251649 | |||
| Phytophthora megakarya | IMI337104 | Theobroma cacao | Ghana | AF266782 | |
| Phytophthora mengei | 42B2 | EU748545 | |||
| Phytophthora mexicana | P0646 | Mexico | HQ261620 | ||
| Phytophthora mirabilis | CBS67885 | AF266777 | |||
| Phytophthora multivesiculata | CBS545.96 | Cymbidium | Netherlands | AF266790 | |
| Phytophthora multivora | DDS1450 | Australia | FJ237515.2 | ||
| Phytophthora multivora | CBS 124094 | Australia | FJ237521.2 | ||
| Phytophthora nemorosa | 2055.2 | USA | AY332654 | ||
| Phytophthora nicotianae | Phkq1 | AB217682 | |||
| Phytophthora nicotianae | UQ848 | Australia | AF266776 | ||
| Phytophthora occultans | CBS 101557 | Netherlands | JX978155 | ||
| Phytophthora pachypleura | BH-2013 | UK | KC855330 | ||
| Phytophthora palmivora | UQ1294 | Theobroma cacao | Papua New Guinea | AF266780 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | P6390 | Indonesia | HQ261633 | ||
| Phytophthora palmivora | CBS27433 | Cyprus | HQ643308 | ||
| Phytophthora palmivora | PHY02 | KT175509 | |||
| Phytophthora palmivora | 2713 | Rododendron simsii | Brazil | MK932672 | MK937526 |
| Phytophthora palmivora | 2714 | Rododendron simsii | Brazil | MK932673 | MK937525 |
| Phytophthora phaseoli | CBS55688 | AF266778 | |||
| Phytophthora pini | 16A8 | USA | GQ324989 | ||
| Phytophthora plurivora | CBS 124089 | Germany | FJ665225 | ||
| Phytophthora plurivora | CBS 124089 | Italy | FJ665227 | ||
| Phytophthora pluvialis | LC | USA | KC529657 | ||
| Phytophthora pseudosyringae | PSEU 6 | AY230190 | |||
| Phytophthora pseudosyringae | PSEU 12 | AY242980 | |||
| Phytophthora pseudotsugae | IMI331662 | Pseudotsuga menziesil | USA | AF266774 | |
| Phytophthora psychrophila | IFB | Querus robur | Germany | AF449494 | |
| Phytophthora quercetorum | MD 9/2 | USA | DQ313223 | ||
| Phytophthora quercina | IFB | Germany | AJ131986 | ||
| Phytophthora siskiyouensis | 9585.2 | USA | EF490682 | ||
| Phytophthora stricta | 58A2 | KF192695 | |||
| Phytophthora tentaculata | CBS55296 | Chrysanthemum leucanthemum | Germany | AF266775 | |
| Phytophthora terminalis | PD4885512 | Netherlands | JX978167 | ||
| Phytophthora tropicalis | H352(A2) | AY208125 | |||
| Pythium undulatum | IMI337230 | Larix sp. | Scotland | AF271230 | |
| Phytophthora acerina | B057 | Italy | JX951285 | ||
| Phytophthora andina | P13365 | Solanum brevifolium | Ecuador | GU318297 | |
| Phytophthora cactorum | P6625 | Fragaria s. | Taiwan | JF771401 | |
| Phytophthora cactorum | P7014 | Syringa vulgaris | The Netherlands | GU221951 | |
| Phytophthora cajani | P3105 | Cajanus cajani | Índia | GU221954 | |
| Phytophthora cambivora | P0592 | Abies procera | USA | JF771263 | |
| Phytophthora cinnamomi | P2110 | Cinnamomum burmannii | West Sumatra | JF771337 | |
| Phytophthora cinnamomi var. parvispora | P8495 | Beaucamea sp. | Germany | GU221971 | |
| Phytophthora cinnamomi var. robiniae | P16350 | Robinia pseudoacacia | China | JF771397 | |
| Phytophthora europaea | P10324 | Quercus rhizosphere | France | GU222005 | |
| Phytophthora fragariae | P3821 | Fragaria sp. | UK | JF771445 | |
| Phytophthora hedraiandra | P11056 | Rhododendron sp. | USA | JF771449 | |
| Phytophthora heveae | P3428 | Hevea brasiliensis | Malaysia | GU222027 | |
| Phytophthora hibernalis | P3822 | Citrus sinensis | Australia | GU222029 | |
| Phytophthora idaei | P6767 | Rubus idaeus | UK | GU222032 | |
| Phytophthora infestans | P10650 | Solanum tuberosum | Mexico | GU318302 | |
| Phytophthora ipomoeae | P10225 | Ipomoea longipedunculata | Mexico | GU222045 | |
| Phytophthora iranica | P3882 | Solanum melongena | Iran | GU222048 | |
| Phytophthora katsurae | P10187 | Castanea crenata | Japan | GU222049 | |
| Phytophthora megakarya | P8516 | Theobroma cacao | São tome | GU222067 | |
| Phytophthora melonis | P10994 | Trichosanthes dioica | Índia | JF771523 | |
| Phytophthora mirabilis | P3005 | Mirabilis jalapa | Mexico | GU222077 | |
| Phytophthora multivesiculata | P10525 | Cymbidium sp. | Netherlands | JF771529 | |
| Phytophthora multivesiculata | P10410 | Cymbidium sp. | Netherlands | JF771528 | |
| Phytophthora multivesiculata | P10327 | Cymbidium sp. | Netherlands | JF771527 | |
| Phytophthora nicotianae | P6303 | Grammatophyllum sp. | Indonesia | GU318304 | |
| Phytophthora niederhauserii | P10617 | Thuja occidentalis | USA | GU222092 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | PI-5 | Theobroma cacao | Brazil | AY129218 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | P11007 | Areca catechu | Guam | MH760260 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | P0497 | Theobroma cacao | Colombia | MH760254 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | CBS 111346 | Cymbidium sp. | South Korea | MH760267 | |
| Phytophthora palmivora | P16385 | Howea forsteriana | USA | MH760259 | |
| Phytophthora phaseoli | P10145 | Phaseolus lunatus | USA | GU222104 | |
| Phytophthora pistaciae | P6197 | Pistacia vera | Iran | GU222109 | |
| Phytophthora pseudotsugae | P10339 | Pseudotsuga menziesii | USA | GU222121 | |
| Phytophthora quercetorum | P15555 | Quercus rubra rhizosphere | USA | GU222124 | |
| Phytophthora quercina | P10334 | Quercus robur | Germany | GU222125 | |
| Phytophthora ramorum | P10301 | Rhododendron sp. | Netherlands | GU222130 | |
| Phytophthora rubi | P3289 | Rubus sp. | USA | GU222132 | |
| Phytophthora sojae | P3114 | Glycine max | USA | GU222142 | |
| Phytophthora tentaculata | P8497 | Chrysanthemum leucanthemum | Germany | GU222150 | |
| Phytophthora uliginosa | P10413 | GU222156 | |||
| Phytophthora uliginosa | P10328 | Quercus robur rhizosphere | Germany | GU222155 | |
| Phytophthora uniformis | P16206 | Alnus sp. | Sweden | JQ439404 | |
| Phytophthora vignae | P3019 | Vigna unguiculata | Australia | GU222157 | |
| Pythium undulatum | P10342 | Larix sp. | UK | JQ439490 | |
The isolates were deposited in the Phytophthora Collection Arnaldo Medeiros of CEPEC/CEPLAC (Ilhéus-BA), under the numbers 02713 and 02714. The two isolates were cultured alone or paired with reference isolates of P. palmivora A1 and A2 mating types in clarified V8 culture medium and carrot-agar medium. Plates with the isolate colonies were kept in a BOD incubator at 25–27 °C under continuous light to induce the production of asexual reproductive structures for morphometric characterization. Among the evaluated characters are presence or absence of chlamydospores, sporangia mean of length and breadth and length/breadth ration, apical thickening of sporangia (papilla) and width of the exit pore, and caducity of sporangia and pedicel length average. For each isolate, 50 of these structures were randomly measured and the average of each attribute was considered for comparison with taxonomic keys. Disks of 5-day-old colonies on carrot-agar of each one of the azalea isolates were paired with standard A1 and A2 isolates of P. palmivora using the sandwich method [23] and kept in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days, aiming to know the mating type of each isolate and to obtain sexual reproductive structures for measurement. It was observed the antheridia type, the diameter of the oogonia, and the diameter and type of oospores. The characteristics analyzed were compared with the descriptions of the taxonomic key of Erwing and Ribeiro [5].
Phylogenetic analysis
The COX2 and ITS sequences were assembled and edited according to base pair quality as evaluated using the Lasergene Molecular Biology Package (DNAstar, Madison, WI, USA). Ambiguities and other errors were verified in the corresponding electropherograms and then removed and/or corrected manually. Preliminary identification of the organisms was performed using BLASTn tool in NCBI [24]. Due to the close identity of the isolates with P. palmivora, sequences of reference isolates of this genus were retrieved from the GenBank and Phytophthora-ID [25] (Table 1).
The alignments of COX2 and ITS were performed separately with the help of the MAFFT plugin [26] in Geneious Prime 2019 [27] with trimming performed to its extremities. For the phylogenetic analysis, best fit models were chosen for each region using Akaike information criterion with Mega X [28], resulting in GTR + G + I model for both COX2 and ITS. Phylogeny was performed separately for each genomic region in Mrbayes plugin [29], version 3.2.2, also in Geneious Prime 2019 with 2 million generations chain and burn-in of 25% [27].
Pathogenicity in azalea and host range characterization
To evaluate the range of hosts, several species of fruit, ornamental, and vegetables were tested. Depending on the plant organ to be inoculated, two different methods of inoculation were used, culture disc on detached fruits and spraying the aerial organs of the plant with a suspension of zoospores of the pathogen.
The first assay of pathogenicity was done in fruits and other organs of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicon L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), apple (Malus domestica L.), lemon [Citrus limon (L.) Osbeck], orange (Citrus sp.), maroon cucumber (Cucumis anguria L.), guava (Psidium guajava L.), papaya (Carica papaya L.), onion (Allium cepa L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), banana (Musa sp.), Zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.), carrot (Daucus carota L.), and scarlet eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L.). These fruits were washed and disinfested with 0.5% hypochlorite. The inoculation was performed by removing a disk of culture of 5 mm diameter containing active growing mycelium that was placed in contact with a wound caused by a sterilized entomological pin on the surface of the fruit. Three fruits were used for each isolate and two discs were deposited on opposite sides of each fruit. The fruits were then placed in a wet chamber at room temperature (23 to 28 °C). The evaluation was performed from the second to the fourth day, and consisted in observing the incidence of fruit or other organ with symptoms of rotting. As a control, discs of clarified V8 culture medium were placed in contact with the fruits surface. The re-isolation of the pathogen from symptomatic fruits was done in selective V8 media.
In the second pathogenicity test, aiming to evaluate the ability of the azalea isolates to infect the aerial part of ornamental plants and vegetables, the following species were tested: snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.), African violet (Saintpaulia ionantha J.C. Wendl), geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum L.H. Bailey), perpetual (Gomphrena globosa L.), vinca (Vinca rosea L.), basil (Ocimum basilicum L.), tomato (S. lycopersicum), and sweet pepper (C. annuum), while using azalea plants as positive control. The plants were transplanted into 2 L pots containing sterile soil. For inoculum preparation, the isolates were cultivated in clarified V8 culture medium and kept under continuous light for 7 days. After the sporangia formation, distilled water was added to the cultures, and the plates were kept in a refrigerator at 5 °C for 1 h. After this time, the plates remained at room temperature for 1 h. The zoospore suspension was filtered in double-layered gauze into a glass Becker. Then, the zoospores concentration of the suspension was estimated with a hemacytometer [30]. The inoculum concentration was adjusted to 1 × 105 zoospores mL−1 and was subsequently sprayed on the aerial part of the plants. These plants were maintained in wet chamber, made with plastic bags moistened internally and placed over the plants and around the vessels, for 24 h. After this, the plants were kept in greenhouse for the next 6 days. At the seventh day of inoculation, the disease incidence was evaluated in leaves and flowers. The pathogen was re-isolated from the symptomatic plants in selective V8 media.
Results
Two oomycete isolates were obtained from azalea plants with floral rot. The isolates were deposited in the CEPLAC Phytophthora culture collection under codes 02713 and 02714. BLASTn preliminary results indicated a close identity with several P. palmivora isolates, both for COX2 and ITS regions. The nucleotide identity of the ITS region was 100% and the COX2 was 99% with sequences of reference isolates of P. palmivora deposited on GenBank. The morphological and morphometric characteristics of the two isolates also corresponded to those described for the species P. palmivora [5] (Table 2). Both isolates produced oospores when paired with A2 standard isolates being identified as P. palmivora of the A1 mating type. Chlamydospores intercalary and terminal were seen.
Table 2.
Morphological characteristics of the Phytophthora palmivora isolates obtained from symptomatic azalea plants
| Characteristic | Isolate | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 02713 | 2714 | ||
| Sporangium | La | 26–13 (19.6) | 24–14 (17.9) |
| Cb | 44–20 (36.8) | 39–23 (30.5) | |
| Sporangium C/L relation | 1.8: 1 | 1.7: 1 | |
| Papilla depth | 5.2–2.2 (3.08) | 6.1–1.7 (3.15) | |
| Apical pore openness | 4.8–3.0 (3.68) | 5.3–2.0 (3.98) | |
| Pedicels length | 2.8–1.8 (2.24) | 3.3–1.3 (2.21) | |
| Antheridia diameter | 13–20 (15.92) | 12–18 (15.06) | |
| Oogonia diameter | 21–29 (24.78) | 17–32 (26.32) | |
| Oospore diameter | 19–26 (22.14) | 22–27 (23.72) | |
| Oosporo type | Aplerotic | Aplerotic | |
| Antheridia insertion | Amphigynous | Amphigynous | |
Amplitude of the dimensions variation of each structure followed by the average between parentheses
aL = Sporangium width
bC = Sporangium length
Fragments of the ITS regions of rDNA and from the COX2 regions of mtDNA amplified from azalea Phytophthora sp. isolates presented 544 and 639 base pairs to isolate 02713 and 451 and 640 base pairs to 02714, respectively.
The Bayesian inference analyses of the single regions (ITS or COX2) displayed similar tree topologies with high posterior probability levels. For the COX2 region, both isolates grouped with other five P. palmivora, with a posterior probability of “1” (Fig. 1) clustering closer to accession AY129218, isolated from cacao (Theobroma cacao) while farther to other accessions originally isolated from Kentia palm (Howea forsteriana Bacc.), orchid (Cymbidium spp.), and palm tree (Areca catechu L.). For the ITS region, both isolates 02713 and 02714 clustered with other four P. palmivora accessions also with the maximum posterior probability value (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic trees constructed by Bayesian inference using Mrbayes plugin in Geneious Prime 2019 with 2 million generations and 25% burnin. Model GTR + G + I chosen separately for each region in MEGA X using Akaike information criterion. a Phylogenetic tree of ITS region with accession AF281230 of Pythium undulatum as outgroup. b Phylogenetic tree of COX2 partial sequence with accession JQ439490 of Pythium undulatum as outgroup
After inoculation in healthy azalea plants, both isolates induced symptoms similar to those observed on the commercial plants, such as floral blight and rot, as well as leaf spots (Fig. 2a). Control plants not inoculated with the pathogen remained free of symptoms (Fig. 2b). An oomycete with morphological characteristics similar to P. palmivora was re-isolated from the symptomatic flowers in pure culture confirming the etiology of the disease. In the control plants, the pathogen re-isolation was negative.
Fig. 2.
Azalea plant showing symptoms of floral rot after inoculation with Phytophthora palmivora zoospores (a) and noninoculated control (b)
When inoculated in fruits, the P. palmivora isolates were able to cause lesions in scarlet eggplant, on tomato, potato, sweet pepper, guava, carrot, maroon cucumber, zucchini, cucumber, onion, apple, and papaya (Table 3). The isolates were not pathogenic to banana, lemon, and orange fruits. An illustration of the symptoms on some organs of the other hosts can be seemed in Fig. 3a–f.
Table 3.
Pathogenicity of Phytophthora palmivora isolates in different plant species by two methods of inoculation
| Plant species | Inoculation method | |
|---|---|---|
| Fruit | Aerial part | |
| Tomato | + | + |
| Potato | + | NA |
| Apple | + | NA |
| Lemon | − | NA |
| Orange | − | NA |
| Papaya | + | NA |
| Onion | + | NA |
| cucumber | + | NA |
| Sweet pepper | + | − |
| Banana | − | NA |
| Zucchini | + | NA |
| Maroon cucumber | + | NA |
| Guava | + | NA |
| Carrot | + | NA |
| Scarlet eggplant | + | NA |
| Azalea | NA | + |
| Vinca | NA | + |
| Snapdragon | NA | + |
| African violet | NA | − |
| Geranium | NA | + |
| Perpetual | NA | − |
| Basil | NA | + |
−: No symptoms
NA not evaluated
Fig. 3.
Illustration of the symptoms in some plant species inoculated with Phytophthora palmivora isolates: a Scarlet eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum), b Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon), c Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), d Guava (Psidium guajava), e Carrot (Daucus carota), Maroom cucumber (Cucumis anguria), g Geranium (Pelargonium × hortorum), h Snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus), and i Vinca (Vinca rosea)
When the P. palmivora isolate was inoculated in the aerial part of the other testing plants, it was able to cause necrotic lesions on leaves of vinca, snapdragon, basil, and tomato, and affected both leaves and flowers of geranium (Table 3). The symptoms induced by the pathogen on flowers of geranium, snapdragon, and vinca can be seemed in Fig. 3g–i. The azalea plants used as positive control confirmed the pathogenicity of the isolate that is capable of affecting both leaves and flowers of this species.
An oomycete with the same morphological characteristics of the species P. palmivora was re-isolated from the symptomatic plants and fruits in both assays, but not from the controls.
Discussion
The morphological and morphometric characteristics of the two isolates corresponded to those described for the species P. palmivora [5] (Table 2). Both isolates produced oospores when paired with A2 standard isolates, but not with A1 isolates and in pure cultures, being identified as P. palmivora of the mating type A1. These findings confirm the heterothalic condition of the isolates and agree with other works that the A1 mating type of P. palmivora is the most common in Brazil [31–33].
The phylogenetic analysis based upon the ITS and COX2 genomic regions positioned Phytophthora isolates from azalea together with P. palmivora and close to P. quercetorum as in Martin et al. 2014 [20], confirming the species identity. In addition, likewise reported by Maseko et al. [34], the azalea isolates of P. palmivora were closely related to P. quercetorum and P. alticola considering the sequences of the COX2 and ITS regions.
The pathogenicity tests confirmed P. palmivora as the causal agent of a floral rot in azalea. In other studies, azalea plants have shown high susceptibility to Phytophthora species [35–37]. In Hong et al. [37], several Phytophthora species were found to be pathogenic to one azalea species (Rhododendron obtusum Planch.), such as P. irrigata and P. hydrophatica, new taxa recovered from irrigation water sources, in addition to P. tropicalis, P. gonapodyides, P. citricola, P. nicotiane, and P. palmivora. However, in this study, the species R. simsii was not tested as host of P. palmivora isolates.
This study shows that the isolates of P. palmivora obtained from azalea can cause disease on several species of vegetables and ornamentals like reported previously [38, 39]. According to Drenth and Guest [40], in tropical and subtropical regions, P. palmivora can attack more than 170 different species of plants, among dicotyledons and monocotyledons causing considerable losses of production. Besides that, this pathogen is able to infect many plant organs such as roots, stems, branches, flowers, leaves, and fruits.
In Brazil, besides the main crops like cacao (Theobroma cacao L.), citrus (Citrus spp.), rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg.), pejiebay or peach palm (Bactris gasipaes Kunth), papaya (Carica papaya L.), and fruit crops like soursop (Anona muricata L.), sweetsop (Anona squamosa L.), cupuaçu [Theobroma grandiflorum (wild.ex Spreng) Schum], and fig (Ficus carica L.), some ornamental plants such as anthurium or flamingo flower (Anthurium andreanum Linden), scarlet banana or red flower banana (Musa coccinea Andrews), orchid (Cattleya sp.); vegetable crops as; cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala), scarlet eggplant (Solanum aethiopicum L.), and basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) are known hosts of P. palmivora [33, 41, 42]. The presence of this polyphagous plant pathogen in commercial areas of ornamentals is worrying because these areas are characterized by a great diversity of species in the same environment. In addition to this, the region around the municipality of Holambra-SP, is one of the main poles of flower production in Brazil, dominating the supply of flowers in practically the whole country [43]. This aspect is important from the epidemiological point of view of plant diseases, considering that long-distance dissemination of most pathogen occurs mainly through the transit of contaminated plant material.
Thus, considering the identification of oomycete species pathogenic to azalea such as P. palmivora, this is the first report of this disease in azalea in Brazil. In addition, after intense survey to the literature, there were no reports of P. palmivora causing flower rot in R. simsii in the world [5, 9]. This study extended the pathogenic action of this oomycete species corroborating previous reports that P. palmivora presents a wide host range.
Acknowledgments
Ailton Reis was supported by a fellowship from the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
All authors have reviewed the manuscript and approved its submission to Brazilian Journal of Microbiology.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.AGRIANUAL . Anuário da Agricultura Brasileira. IEG/FNP: São Paulo; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 2.SEBRAE. Flores e plantas ornamentais do Brasil. Série estudos mercadológicos, vol. 1. http://www.bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/7ed114f4eace9ea970dadf63bc8baa29/$File/5518.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2016
- 3.Junqueira AH, Peetz MS (2007) Inteligência Comercial no Mercado de Flores. Palestra apresentada no Seminário Setorial Mercado de Flores da 14ª Semana Internacional da Fruticultura, Floricultura e Agroindústria – FRUTAL / Flor Brazil
- 4.Lorenzi H, Souza HM. Plantas ornamentais no Brasil: arbustivas, herbáceas e trepadeiras. Nova Odessa: Plantarum; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. St. Paul: APS Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knaus BJ, Graham KA, Grünwald NJ, Fieland VJ (2017) Diversity of foliar Phytophthora species on Rhododendron in Oregon nurseries. In proceedings of the sudden oak death sixth science symposium. General technical report. GTR-PSW-255. Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific southwest Research Station: 76:76
- 7.Werres S (2000) Phytophthora spp. of Rhododendron and Azaleas. In Rhododendron und immergrune Laubgeholze, Jahrbuch der Deutschen Rhododendron Gesellschaft 1999 (J. Westhoff, ed.): 96–113
- 8.Torres GA, Sarria GA, Martinez G, Varon F, Drenth A, Guest D. Bud rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora: a destructive emerging disease of oil palm. Phytopathology. 2016;106:320–329. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-15-0243-RVW. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Farr DF, Rossman AY (2019) Fungal Databases, U.S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases/. Accessed 5 Aug 2019
- 10.Torres GA, Sarria G, Varon F, Coffey M, Elliott M, Martinez G. First report of bud rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora on African oil palm in Colombia. Plant Dis. 2010;94:1163–1163. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-9-1163A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mendes MAS, Urben AF Fungos relatados em plantas no Brasil, Laboratório de Quarentena Vegetal. Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília http://pragawall.cenargen.embrapa.br/aiqweb/michtml/fgbanco01.asp. Accessed 5 Nov 2019
- 12.Waterhouse GM (1963) Key to the species Phytophthora de Bary. Mycological paper no. 92. CMI, Kew, UK
- 13.Crawford AR, Bassam BJ, Drenth A, Maclean DJ, Irwin JAG. Evolutionary relationships among Phytophthora species deduced from rDNA sequence analysis. Mycol Res. 1996;100:437–443. doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(96)80140-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cooke DEL, Duncan JM. Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of the ribosomal RNA gene repeat. Mycol Res. 1997;101:667–677. doi: 10.1017/S0953756296003218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Förster H, Cummings MP, Coffey MD. Phylogenetic relationships of Phytophthora species based on ribosomal ITS I DNA sequence analysis with emphasis on Waterhouse groups V and VI. Mycol Res. 2000;104:1055–1061. doi: 10.1017/S0953756200003087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martin FN, Tooley PW. Phylogenetic relationships among Phytophthora species inferred from sequence analysis of mitochondrially encoded cytochrome oxidase I and II genes. Mycologia. 2003;95:269–284. doi: 10.1080/15572536.2004.11833112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Martin FN, Tooley PW. Phylogenetic relationships of Phytophthora ramorum, P. nemorosa and P. pseudosyringae, three species recovered from areas in California with sudden oak death. Mycol Res. 2003;107:1379–1391. doi: 10.1017/S0953756203008785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cooke DEL, Drenth A, Duncan JM, Wagels G, Brasier CM. A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related oomycetes. Fungal Genet Biol. 2000;30:17–32. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2000.1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Blair JE, Coffey MD, Park SY, Geiser DM, Kang SC. A multi-locus phylogeny for Phytophthora utilizing markers derived from complete genome sequences. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Martin FN, Blair JE, Coffey MD. A combined mitochondrial and nuclear multilocus phylogeny of the genus Phytophthora. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;66:19–32. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mahuku GS. A simple extraction method suitable for PCR-based analysis of plant, fungal, and bacterial DNA. Plant Mol Biol Report. 2004;22:71–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02773351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hudspeth DSS, Nadler SA, Hudspeth MES. A COX2 molecular phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes. Mycologia. 2000;92:674–684. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2000.12061208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Luz EDMN, Silva SDVM, Bezerra JL, Souza JT, Santos AF. Glossário Ilustrado de Phytophthora: técnicas especiais para o estudo de oomicetos. 1. Itabuna: FAPESB/Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Aschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grünwald NJ, Martin FN, Larsen MM, Sullivan CM, Press CM, Coffey MD, Hansen EM, Parke JL. Phytophthora-ID.org: a sequence-based Phytophthora identification tool. Plant Dis. 2011;95:337–342. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-10-0609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, ... Thierer T (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:754–755. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Reifschneider FJB, Café-Filho AC, Rego AM. Factors affecting expression of resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum) to blight caused by Phytophthora capsici in screening trials. Plant Pathol. 1986;35:451–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1986.tb02042.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Decloquement J, Ramos-Sobrinho R, Britto DS, Reis A, Honorato-Junior J, Pinho DB, Marelli JP. First report of Phytophthora palmivora causing black pod on a Herrania sp. in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2019;103:1435. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-18-1287-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lopes HV, Santos AF, Luz EDMN, Tessmann DJ. Phytophthora palmivora: agente causal da podridão da base do estipe da pupunheira no Brasil. Summa Phytopathol. 2019;45:164–171. doi: 10.1590/0100-5405/189782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Santos AF, Santo F, Mezzomo R, Tessmann DJ, May de Mio LL. First report of fruit rot caused by Phytophthora palmivora on fig in Brazil. Plant Dis. 2017;101:1331. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1143-PDN. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Maseko B, Burgess TI, Coutinho TA, Wingfield MJ. Two new Phytophthora species from South African Eucalyptus plantations. Mycol Res. 2007;111:1321–1338. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Benson DM, Cochran FD. resistance of evergreen hybrid azaleas to root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant Dis. 1980;64:214–215. doi: 10.1094/PD-64-214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Donahoo R, Blomquist CL, Thomas SL, Moulton JK, Cooke DEL, Lamour KH. Phytophthora foliorum sp. nov., a new species causing leaf blight of azalea. Mycol Res. 2006;110:1309–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hong CX, Richardson PA, Kong P. Pathogenicity to ornamental plants of some existing species and new taxa of Phytophthora from irrigation water. Plant Dis. 2008;92:1201–1207. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-8-1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hwang J, Benson DM. Identification, mefenoxam sensitivity, and compatibility type of Phytophthora spp. attacking floriculture crops in North Carolina. Plant Dis. 2005;89:185–190. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Olson HA, Jeffers SN, Ivors KL, Steddom KC, Williams-Woodward JL, Mmbaga MT, Benson DM, Hong CX. Diversity and mefenoxam sensitivity of Phytophthora spp. associated with the ornamental horticulture industry in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis. 2013;97:86–92. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-12-0348-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Drenth A, Guest DI. Phytophthora palmivora in tropical tree crops. In: Lamour KH, editor. Phytophthora: a global perspetive. Wallingfprd: CABI; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Luz EDMN, Matsuoka K. Phytophthora: fungo, protista ou chromista? In: Luz EDMN, Santos AF, Matsuoka K, Bezerra JL, editors. Doenças causadas por Phytophthora no Brasil. Livraria e editora rural: Campinas; 2001. pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar]
- 42.dos Santos MVO, Luz EDMN. Phytophthora palmivora na rizosfera de cultivos agrícolas no Sul da Bahia. Agrotrópica. 2014;26:203–206. doi: 10.21757/0103-3816.2014v26n3p203-206. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Aki A, Perosa JMY. Aspectos da produção e consumo de flores e plantas ornamentais no Brasil. Rev Bras Hortic Ornamental. 2002;8:13–23. [Google Scholar]



