Table 2.
Frequency of antibiotic resistance among S. Enteritidis isolates (n = 108) from an industrial chicken production chain in Santa Catarina, Brazil
| Antibioticsa | Resistant (n) | Intermediate (n) | Susceptible (n) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enrofloxacin (ENR) | 20 | 65 | 23 |
| Furazolidone (FUR) | 17 | 57 | 34 |
| Imipenem (IPM) | 3 | 0 | 105 |
| Cefoxitin (FOX) | 2 | 4 | 102 |
| Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | 1 | 6 | 101 |
| Ampicillin (AMP) | 1 | 1 | 106 |
| Tetracycline (TET) | 0 | 3 | 105 |
| Chloramphenicol (CH) | 0 | 1 | 107 |
| Cefotaxime (CTX) | 0 | 1 | 107 |
| Sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (STX) | 0 | 0 | 108 |
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | 0 | 0 | 108 |
| Amikacin (AK) | 0 | 0 | 108 |
aAK amikacin (30 μg), AMP ampicillin (10 μg), CTX cefotaxime (30 μg), FOX cefoxitin (30 μg), CAZ ceftazidime (30 μg), CIP ciprofloxacin (5 μg), CH chloramphenicol (30 μg), ENR enrofloxacin (5 μg), IPM imipenem (10 μg), STX sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (25 μg), TET tetracycline (30 μg), FUR furazolidone (15 μg)