Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;11:534688. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.534688

TABLE 4.

Running and cycling performance for Intervention and Control group during the study period.

INT
CON
Group comparison*
t0 t1 t0 t1 F p ηp2
Run
Lac max (mmol/L) 7.2 ± 1.5 7.8 ± 1.4 7.5 ± 1.5 7.3 ± 1.5 0.32 0.583 0.02
LT1 (km/h) 12.0 ± 1.3 12.4 ± 1.3 11.8 ± 1.3 11.7 ± 1.0 2.24 0.160 0.16
LT2 (km/h) 15.0 ± 1.4 15.6 ± 1.2 15.3 ± 0.9 15.5 ± 1.5 0.71 0.416 0.06
Peak (km/h) 16.8 ± 1.6 18.0 ± 2.0 17.3 ± 1.2 17.9 ± 2.0 0.96 0.346 0.07
Bike
Lac min (mmol/L) 1.6 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.4 0.02 0.891 0.00
Lac max (mmol/L) 10.6 ± 2.2 9.9 ± 2.3 10.5 ± 2.9 9.2 ± 2.2 0.12 0.728 0.01
LT1 (W) 204 ± 48.0 212 ± 36.0 202 ± 42.0 196 ± 38.0 1.57 0.234 0.12
LT2 (W) 282 ± 54.0 291 ± 43.0 264 ± 52.0 261 ± 48.0 1.86 0.197 0.13
Peak (W) 370 ± 70.0 378 ± 72.0 354 ± 67.0 335 ± 77.0 2.71 0.125 0.18

Values are mean ± Standard Deviation (SD). INT, Intervention; CON, Control Group. *Repeated ANOVA, effect sizes were calculated as partial ηp2.