Table 3.

Outcomes after non-operative treatment.^7,9–12,22

Patient	Paper	Age	Sex	Pre-operative Dx	Prosthesis	Time to # (months)	Classification	Union?	Other treatment?	Final score	Time of final score
1	Teusink et al.10	79	M	CTA	DJO	10	NS	NS	NS	ASES 48	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
2	Teusink et al.10	77	F	CTA	DJO	4	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 47	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
3	Teusink et al.10	71	F	Failed RCR	DJO	31	NS	NS	NS	ASES 80	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
4	Teusink et al.10	75	F	CTA	DJO	3	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 28	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
5	Teusink et al.10	74	F	CTA	DJO	3	NS	NS	NS	ASES 55	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
6	Teusink et al.10	65	M	CTA	DJO	3	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 90	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
7	Teusink et al.10	70	F	CTA	DJO	35	NS	NS	NS	NS	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
8	Teusink et al.10	74	F	CTA	DJO	3	NS	NS	NS	ASES 63	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
9	Teusink et al.10	81	F	CTA	DJO	2	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 75	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
10	Teusink et al.10	64	M	CTA	DJO	6	NS	NS	NS	ASES 60	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
11	Teusink et al.10	78	F	CTA	DJO	3	NS	NS	NS	ASES 45	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
12	Teusink et al.10	66	F	Failed hemi	DJO	4	NS	NS	NS	ASES 57	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
13	Teusink et al.10	56	F	Failed TSA	DJO	5	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 35	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
14	Teusink et al.10	62	F	Failed hemi	DJO	20	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 55	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
15	Teusink et al.10	83	F	CTA	DJO	7	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 50	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
16	Teusink et al.10	82	F	CTA	DJO	4	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 82	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
17	Teusink et al.10	65	F	CTA	DJO	1	NS	Yes	NS	ASES 88	>12/12 from #, >24/12 from surgery
18	Wahlquist et al.12	80	F	Failed TSR	DePuy	7	‘Base’	NS	sling, bone stimulator	Neer 66	26
19	Wahlquist et al.12	83	F	Failed RCR	Zimmer TM	10	‘Base’	Yes	sling, bone stimulator	Neer 56	13
20	Hamid et al.7	87	F	NS	NS	3	‘Midacromion’	No	NS	ASES 98, DASH 20	NS
21	Hamid et al.7	82	F	NS	NS	2	‘Midacromion’	No	NS	ASES 28, DASH 65	NS
22	Hamid et al.7	87	F	NS	NS	38	‘Base’	No	NS	ASES 93, DASH 32	NS
23	Hamid et al.7	91	F	NS	NS	5	‘Base’	Yes (mal)	NS	ASES 24, DASH 77	NS
24	Hamid et al.7	69	F	NS	NS	2	‘Base’	No	NS	ASES 49, DASH 58	NS
25	Hamid et al.7	63	F	NS	NS	48	‘Midacromion’	No	NS	ASES 95, DASH 23	NS
26	Hamid et al.7	63	F	NS	NS	13	‘Base’	No	NS	ASES 73, DASH 58	NS
27	Hamid et al.7	68	F	NS	NS	2	‘Lateral’	No	NS	ASES 97, DASH 5	NS
28	Boileau et al.22	NS	NS	NS	NS	3	NS	NS	NS	CMS 69	NS
29	Boileau et al.22	NS	NS	NS	NS	3	NS	NS	NS	CMS 77	NS
30	Kennon et al.11	78	F	NS	Equinoxe, Exactech	5	Crosby III	NS	No	ASES 72, UCLA 28, SST 7, CMS 67	60
31	Kennon et al.11	83	M	NS	Equinoxe, Exactech	6	Crosby III	NS	No	ASES 78, UCLA 28, SST 10, CMS 47	48
32	Walch et al.9	NS	NS	Failed hemi		3	Walch	No	NS	CMS 15	36
33	Walch et al.9	NS	NS	CTA		3	Walch 40°	Yes	NS	CMS 38	24
34	Walch et al.9			CTA		12	Walch 55°	NS	NS	CMS 44	24

ASES: American Shoulder and Elbow Society; CMS: Constant–Murley Score; CTA: cuff tear arthropathy; DASH: Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder & Hand; F: female; M: male; NA: not applicable; NS: not specified; RCR: Rotator Cuff Repair; SST: Simple Shoulder Test; TSA: total shoulder arthroplasty; TSR: Total Shoulder Replacement; UCLA: University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Score. ^#fracture.