Table 3.

Difference in Quality of Nursing Educational Program according to Profile of Faculty

Profile of HEIs	Quality Matrix	F	p-value	Decision (Ho)	Interpretation
Clinical experience	Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives	2.332	0.058	Accept	Not significant
	Curriculum and instruction	0.862	0.488	Accept	Not significant
	Administration of nursing programme	0.672	0.612	Accept	Not significant
	Faculty development program	0.666	0.617	Accept	Not significant
	Physical structure and equipment	0.705	0.589	Accept	Not significant
	Student services	0.763	0.828	Accept	Not significant
	Admission of students	0.302	0.876	Accept	Not significant
	Quality assurance system	0.694	0.597	Accept	Not significant
Teaching experience	Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives	3.600	0.008*	Reject	Significant
	Curriculum and instruction	2.592	0.038*	Reject	Significant
	Administration of nursing programme	2.856	0.025*	Reject	Significant
	Faculty development program	4.162	0.003*	Reject	Significant
	Physical structure and equipment	3.128	0.016*	Reject	Significant
	Student services	3.104	0.017*	Reject	Significant
	Admission of students	3.421	0.010*	Reject	Significant
	Quality assurance system	3.471	0.009*	Reject	Significant
Job category	Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives	1.046	0.376	Accept	Not significant
	Curriculum and instruction	1.107	0.355	Accept	Not significant
	Administration of nursing programme	1.734	0.145	Accept	Not significant
	Faculty development program	1.171	0.325	Accept	Not significant
	Physical structure and equipment	1.114	0.219	Accept	Not significant
	Student services	1.891	0.114	Accept	Not significant
	Admission of students	1.453	0.218	Accept	Not significant
	Quality assurance system	0.538	0.708	Accept	Not significant

The p-values denoted by ‘*’ are significant at a level of p < 0.05, Ho – denotes null hypothesis