Table 1.

Comparison of implementation strategy reporting by method

Name it: ERIC implementation strategy	Operationalize it
	Action	Actor	Context	Dose	Action target		Temporality	Implementation outcome	Justification
					Conceptual	Unit of analysis
Use evaluative and iterative strategies
Conduct local needs assessment	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Develop and implement tools for quality monitoring	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Develop and organize quality monitoring systems	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Stage implementation scale-up	A	A	A		A	A	A	A	A
Provide interactive assistance
Provide clinical supervision	A, T	A, T	A, T	A, T	A	A, T	A, T	A, T	A
Adapt and tailor to context
Promote adaptability	A	A	A		A	A	A	A	A
Develop stakeholder interrelationships
Build a coalition	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Identify early adopters	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Organize clinician implementation team meetings	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Train and educate stakeholders
Conduct educational outreach visits	A, T	A, T	A, T	A, T	A	A, T	A, T	A, T	A
Conduct ongoing training	A, T	A, T	A, T	A, T	A	A, T	A, T	A	A
Create a learning collaborative	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Develop educational materials	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Distribute educational materials	A	A	A		A	A	A	A	A
Make training dynamic	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A	A
Provide ongoing consultation	A, T	A, T	A	A, T	A	A, T	A, T	A	A
Use train-the-trainer strategies	A, T	A, T	A, T	A, T	A	A, T	A, T	A	A
Support clinicians
Create new clinical teams	A, T	A, T	A, T		A, T	A, T	A, T	A	A
Develop resource sharing agreements	A	A	A		A	A	A	A	A
Engage consumers
Utilize financial strategies
Change infrastructure
Change service sites	A	A	A		A	A	A	A	A

A reported by author, T coded in text