Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;41(8):5758–5770. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-01205-1

Table 5.

Validity analysis of the ESQ dimensions

Dimension Factor Loading CR AVE α ω ESQ NA PA OASIS DERS QOL
Outlook .90 .92 .74 .94 .94 .54** −.37** .34** −.34** −.15** .43**
Resilience .89 .92 .75 .936 .94 .54** −.40** .36** −.37** −.17** .43**
Sensitivity to Context .84 .87 .64 .883 .91 .53** −.32** .28** −.31** −.20** .32**
Social Intuition .83 .90 .71 .897 .92 .46** −.25** .21** −.26** −.17** .29**
Self-awareness .82 .90 .70 .896 .91 .45** −.39** .32** −.34** −.25** .37**
Attention .81 .88 .65 .898 .90 .47** −.36** .29** −.34** −.19** .33**

Note: CR = composite reliability; AVE = average variance extracted; MaxR(h) = McDonald construct reliability; α = Cronbach alpha coefficient; WHOQOL-BREF=World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version; DERS = Difficulties In Emotion Regulation Scale; OASIS=Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale; PA = positive affect; NA = negative affect;

ω = McDonald’s coefficient omega

**Correlation is significant at the p < .01 level (2-tailed)