Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;12(11):3082. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113082

Table 1.

Rates of Obesity at Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Diagnosis, End of Treatment, and During Follow-up.

Author (Reference) Study Design Populations Protocols Findings
Van Dongen-Melman et al. [34] RCR n = 113
Age: 0.5–15 years
Overweight/obese patients (>90th BMI percentile) constituted 7.9% (n = 9) of the sample at diagnosis. At the end of therapy, 30% (n = 34) were overweight/obese. At four years after treatment completion, 23.9% (n = 27) were overweight/obese. Radiotherapy was not associated with obesity. Patients who received a combination of dexamethasone and prednisone were at the highest risk of being obese (44%). Higher cumulative steroid dose did not contribute to more obesity.
Withycombe et al. [35] RCR n = 1638
Age: 2–20 years
COG (CCG 1961) Obesity rates in children with high risk ALL were 14% at baseline and 23% at the end of treatment. Females, Black or Hispanic, and age 5–9-year-old, but not cranial irradiation, were risk factors.
The highest increase in BMI% was between maintenance phases 1–3,
9–12 months postdiagnosis. (Induction BMI% 7.2, BMI% 12.6 by maintenance phase 3).
Breene et al. [36] RCR n = 77
Age: 1–16 years
MRC UKALL97 protocol Whole group:
Patients received only chemotherapy and no CRT. Thirty patients (39%) received prednisolone, and 47 (61%) got dexamethasone. Weight gain was not linked to steroids.
There was a significant rise in BMI-SDS from diagnosis (0.35, 95% CI 0.20–0.50) to the end of treatment (1.29, 95% CI 1.13–1.45, p < 0.0001), and at three-year follow-up (1.04, 95% CI 0.85–1.22, p <0.0001). More survivors were overweight or obese at three years post treatment (25/53, 47.20%) when compared to diagnosis (23/77, 29.90%), (p-value 0.01)
Female subgroup:
Significant rise in BMI-SDS from diagnosis (0.46, 95% CI 0.27–0.64), at end of treatment (1.46, 95% CI 1.26–1.66, p < 0.0001) and at three-year follow-up (1.24, 95% CI 1.03–1.45, p < 0.0001)
Male subgroup:
Significant rise in BMI-SDS from diagnosis (0.24, 95% CI 0.01–0.46), to end of treatment (1.11, 95% CI 0.85–1.36, p < 0.0001) and at three-year follow-up (0.77, 95% CI 0.43–1.10, p < 0.0001)
Razzouk et al. [37] RCS n = 248
Age < 19 years
At diagnosis, 13.2–30 years at the latest assessment
Chemotherapy-Total Therapy Study X protocol The prevalence of overweight/obesity in 0–6-year-old (6%) was lower than that in the
13–19-year-old group (19%) at diagnosis. At adult height attainment, the prevalence of overweight/obese in 0-6 years of age at diagnosis was 41%, versus 13–19 years of age at 35%. These rates are close to the USA’s general population.
Those <6 years of age (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2–4.2, p-value 0.01), male (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28–0.91, p-value 0.02), and being overweight/obese at diagnosis (OR 14.00, 95% CI 5.00–39.00, p-value < 0.0001) were predictors of obesity at adult height attainment.
CRT (24 Gy) led to an increase in BMI trajectory, but this was not different from the 18 Gy CRT group.
Ghosh et al. [38] * RCS n = 4775
Age: 2–30 years
Age, sex, and ethnicity-matched controls from NHANES
COG AALL17D2
Newly diagnosed had overweight rates of 17% and obesity rates of 20%. 58% had an average weight, and 5% were underweight.
Males, Hispanics, and
B-cell ALL were associated with obesity. Obesity was associated with CNS disease.
Foster et al. [39] RCS n = 121
Age: 2–15 years
COG AALL0232, AALL0331, AALL0932, AALL1131, POG 9904, POG9905 15% of patients were overweight and 15% of patients were obese at the time of diagnosis of ALL.
At 5-year follow-up, 22% of patients were overweight and 35% of patients were obese.
Start of treatment BMI z-score 0.25 (95% CI 0.01–0.49)
Five-year follow-up BMI z-score 0.99 (95% CI 0.79–1.19; p-value < 0.0001)
Didi et al. [40] PCS n = 114
Age: 2–16 years
MRC UKALL protocol 23/51 male (45%) and 30/63 female (47%) patients were obese at final height attainment.
Female patients:
Girls’ obesity occurred from start to end of treatment then plateaued. Start of treatment BMI z-score 0.05 (95% CI −2.2, 2.0)
End of treatment BMI z-score 1.2, 95% CI 0.3–2.8; p-value 0.0002)
Male patients:
Boys gained weight from the start of treatment, and weight gain continued post-treatment completion. Start of treatment BMI z -score 0.10 (95% CI −1.1, 1.3); End of treatment BMI z-score 0.6 (95% CI −0.4, 4.9; p-value 0.001)
Craig et al. [41] # CSS n = 213 radiotherapy, n = 85 no radiotherapy
Age: 0–16 years
Unirradiated: MRC UKALL XI or infant ALL protocol
Irradiated:
  • 1

    Great Ormond Street Hospital devised protocol, MRC UKALL III-VI or UKALL VIII-X if receiving 18–20 Gy CRT

  • 2

    Great Ormond Street Hospital devised protocol, UKALL I–VI, and UKALL VIII–X if received 22–24 Gy CRT

Female
18–20 Gy CRT:
BMI z-score at diagnosis
−0.24 ± 0.15
BMI z-score at end of treatment 0.46 ± 0.11 (p-value < 0.0001)
22–24 Gy CRT:
BMI z-score at diagnosis
−0.70 ± 0.16
BMI z-score at the end of treatment
−0.17 ± 0.12 (p-value 0.0005)
Male
18–20 Gy CRT: BMI z-score at diagnosis −0.40 ± 0.16
BMI z-score at end of treatment 0.37 ± 0.16 (p-value < 0.0001)
22–24 Gy CRT:
BMI z-score at diagnosis
−0.17 ± 0.28
BMI z-score at end of treatment 0.48 ± 0.16 (p-value 0.02)
BMI z-scores in patients with no history of CRT:
Female
BMI z-score at diagnosis
−0.12 ± 0.19
BMI z-score at end of treatment 0.70 ± 0.17 (p-value < 0.0001)
Male
BMI z-score at diagnosis
0.23 ± 0.26
BMI z-score at end of treatment 0.81 ± 0.18 (p-value 0.01)

Abbreviations: RCR, retrospective chart review; BMI, body mass index; COG, Children’s Oncology Group; CCG, Children’s Cancer Group; BMI%, body mass index percentile; MRC, Medical Research Council; UKALL, United Kingdom Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Regimen; NR, not reported; CI, confidence interval; SDS, standard deviation score; NS, not significant; RCS, retrospective cohort study; CRT, cranial irradiation; OR, odds ratio; Gy, Gray; COG AALL, Children’s Oncology Group Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia protocols; POG, Pediatrics Oncology Group; z-score, standard score; PCS prospective cohort study; CCS, cross-sectional study. # The p-values include a comparison of BMI z-scores from baseline to end of treatment. * This abstract reported a study that compared ALL patients to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) control subjects (n = 30,107). This abstract also validated the already known association of being underweight at ALL diagnosis.