Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;12(11):3082. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113082

Table 2.

Birth Weight and the Risk of Development of ALL.

Author (Reference) Study Design Populations Findings
Hjalgrim et al. [43] Meta-analysis 18 studies
n = 10,282
Age: 0–29 years
BWt > 4000 was associated with a trend of higher risk of ALL
(OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.17–1.37)
Caughey et al. [44] Meta-analysis 32 studies
n = 16,501 Leukemias
(n = 10,974 ALL)
Age: ≤ 30 years
Significant odds for the association of high BWt with ALL risk
(OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15–1.32)
Milne et al. [45] CCS n = 519 patients
Age: 0–14 years
OR for 1 SD increase in proportion to optimal BWt 1.18 (95% CI 1.04–1.35, p < 0.05). However, faster fetal growth, instead of BWt, was the factor associated with ALL risk
Jiménez-Hernández et al. [46] CCS n = 2910 children
Age: 0–18 years
ALL is associated with a birth weight ≥ 2500 g
(OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.59–2.66)
Birth weight ≥ 3500 g was also associated with ALL
OR 1.19 (95% CI: 1.00–1.41)
Sprehe et al. [47] RCR n = 13,988 children
Age < 5 years at cancer diagnosis + age-matched controls
Increased risk of ALL was associated with LGA compared to AGA
LGA (<4000g) OR 1.5 (95% CI: 0.97–2.52, p = 0.0005)
LGA (>4000g) OR 1.67 (95% CI: 1.29–2.16, p = 0.0005)

Abbreviations: BWt, birth weight; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; CCS, case-control study; LGA, large for gestational age; AGA, appropriate for gestational age; RCR, retrospective chart review.