Table 4.
Level of acceptance of enhanced animal-derived food products for respondents stratified by known methods of quality improvement.
| Known Methods of Quality Improvement | Acceptance of Animal-Derived Food Products’ Enhancement as the Quality Improvement Method | p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 * | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | ||
| Indicates product enhancement | 122 (14.8%) |
45 (5.5%) |
58 (7.0%) |
170 (20.6%) |
145 (17.6%) |
76 (9.2%) |
119 (14.4%) |
90 (10.9%) |
0.0783 |
| Indicates method other than product enhancement | 37 (25.2%) |
13 (8.8%) |
7 (4.8%) |
26 (17.7%) |
20 (13.6%) |
17 (11.6%) |
20 (13.6%) |
7 (4.8%) |
|
| Does not know any method to improve quality | 5 (13.5%) |
1 (2.7%) |
2 (5.4%) |
8 (21.6%) |
5 (13.5%) |
8 (21.6%) |
6 (16.2%) |
2 (5.4%) |
|
* 1–3 negative answers (1—definitely; 2—moderately; 3—slightly do not accept); 4—neutral answer; 5–7 positive answers (5—slightly; 6—moderately; 7—definitely accept); 0—do not observe such method for food products of animal origin in Poland.