Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 24;12(11):3106. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113106

Table 2.

Treatment outcome in ≥75-year-old patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials at relapse.

TRIAL Regimen Age,
Median (Range);
Pts aged ≥ 75 Years, %
Median PFS
in the Overall Population, Months
Median PFS
in Pts Aged ≥ 75 Years, Months
Main G ≥ 3
Adverse Events *in Pts Aged ≥75 Years
Discontinuation
Due to Adverse Events in Pts Aged ≥75 Years
ASPIRE [17,63,64] KRd vs. Rd 64 (31–91)
12%
26.3 vs. 17.6 m
HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.57–0.83)
30.3 vs. 16.6 m
HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.36–1.08)
[in pts aged ≥70 years]:
neutropenia 36.9% vs. 23.2%;
thrombocytopenia 20.45 vs. 25.2%;
pneumonia 15.5% vs. 14.3%;
hypertension 5.8% vs. 1.8%;
cardiac failure 8.7% vs. 1.8%
[in pts aged ≥70 years]:
34% vs. 34.8%
ENDEAVOR [18,65] Kd vs. Vd 65 (30–89)
15%
18.7 vs. 9.4 m
HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.44–0.65)
18.7 vs. 8.9 m
HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.22–0.64)
Thrombocytopenia 7.8% vs. 9.2%;
cardiac failure 10.4% vs. 3.1%;
hypertension 11.7% vs. 3.1%;
pneumonia 7.8% vs. 12.3%
26% vs. 35.4%
TOURMALINE-MM1 [62] IRd vs. Rd 66 (30–91)
15%
20.6 vs. 14.7 m
HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.59–0.94)
18.5 vs. 13.1 m
HR 0.87 (95% CI na)
na na
POLLUX [66,67] Dara-Rd vs. Rd 65 (34–89)
11%
44.5 vs. 17.5 m
HR 0.44 (95% CI 0.35–0.55)
28.9 vs. 11.4 m
HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.10–0.69)
Neutropenia 44.8% vs. 31.4%;
thrombocytopenia 10.3% vs. 14%;
pneumonia 17.2% vs. 11.4%;
pulmonary embolism 3.4% vs. 11%;
infusion reaction 13.8%
17% vs. 17%
CASTOR [67,68] Dara-Vd vs. Vd 64 (30–88)
12%
16.7 vs. 7.1 m
HR 0.31 (95% CI 0.24–0.39)
17.9 vs. 8.1 m
HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.10–0.65)
Thrombocytopenia 45% vs. 37.1%;
neuropathy 10% vs. 5.7%;
diarrhea 10% vs. 0;
pneumonia 15% vs. 17%;
infusion reaction 10%
17% vs. 20%
ELOQUENT-2 [69] Elo-Rd vs. Rd 66 (37–91)
20%
19.4 vs. 14.9 m
HR 0.44 (0.59–0.86)
Na
HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.41–0.96)
na na
ICARIA-MM [70] Isa-Pd vs. Pd 67 (36–86)
20%
11.5 vs. 6.5 m
HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.44–0.81)
11.4 vs. 4.5 m
HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24–0.95)
neutropenia 50% vs. 46.4%;
thrombocytopenia 15.6% vs. 10.7%;
infection 46.9% vs. 35.7%;
infusion reaction 3.1%
15.6% vs. 14.3%
ELOQUENT-3 [71] Elo-Pd vs. Pd 67 (36–81)
21%
10.3 vs. 4.7 m
HR 0.54 (95% CI 0.34–0.86)
Na
HR 0.62 (95% CI 0.23–1.67)
na na
OPTIMISMM [72] PVd vs. Vd 68 (59–73)
16%
11.2 vs. 7.1 m
HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.77)
Na
HR 0.78 (0.46–1.32)
na na

Abbreviations: Pts, patients; PFS, progression-free survival; m, months; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; p, p-value; na, not available; RD, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Rd lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Kd, carfilzomib, dexamethasone; Vd, bortezomib, dexamethasone; IRd, ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone; Dara, daratumumab; Elo, elotuzumab; Isa, isatuximab; Pd, pomalidomide, dexamethasone; PVd, pomalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone; G, grade.