Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;24(4):469–476. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.4.469

Table 2.

Type of management strategy of the bile duct injury chosen by various groups of surgeons

Type of repair Individual surgeon in nursing home n=29 Surgeons with <5 year experience with LC n=123 Non biliary surgeons n=99 Working in a non biliary center n=82
On table suture repair 3 (10%) 18 (15%) 11 (11%) 7 (9%)
On table repair over T tube 7 (24%) 19 (15%) 25 (25%) 23 (28%)
On table RYHJ 9 (31%) 31 (25%) 17 (18%) 10(12%)
Drainage alone 6 (21%) 27 (22%) 21 (21%) 21 (26%)
Drainage+endoscopic stenting 3 (10%) 22 (18%) 22 (22%) 17 (21%)
§RYHJ <4 weeks 1 (3%) 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 2 (2%)
§RYHJ >4 weeks 0 4 (3%) 2 (2%) 2 (2%)
Summary of management
Drainage with or without endoscopic stenting 9 (31%) 49 (40%) 43 (43%) 31 (39%)
Repair of BDI 20 (69%) 74 (60%) 56 (57%) 44 (54%)

LC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy; RYHJ, roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy; BDI, bile duct injury