Table 2.
Type of management strategy of the bile duct injury chosen by various groups of surgeons
| Type of repair | Individual surgeon in nursing home n=29 | Surgeons with <5 year experience with LC n=123 | Non biliary surgeons n=99 | Working in a non biliary center n=82 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On table suture repair | 3 (10%) | 18 (15%) | 11 (11%) | 7 (9%) |
| On table repair over T tube | 7 (24%) | 19 (15%) | 25 (25%) | 23 (28%) |
| On table RYHJ | 9 (31%) | 31 (25%) | 17 (18%) | 10(12%) |
| Drainage alone | 6 (21%) | 27 (22%) | 21 (21%) | 21 (26%) |
| Drainage+endoscopic stenting | 3 (10%) | 22 (18%) | 22 (22%) | 17 (21%) |
| §RYHJ <4 weeks | 1 (3%) | 2 (2%) | 1 (1%) | 2 (2%) |
| §RYHJ >4 weeks | 0 | 4 (3%) | 2 (2%) | 2 (2%) |
| Summary of management | ||||
| Drainage with or without endoscopic stenting | 9 (31%) | 49 (40%) | 43 (43%) | 31 (39%) |
| Repair of BDI | 20 (69%) | 74 (60%) | 56 (57%) | 44 (54%) |
LC, laparoscopic cholecystectomy; RYHJ, roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy; BDI, bile duct injury