Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;11:601763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.601763

Table 2.

Summary of ratings (Means and SDs), averaged across target emotions, for the forensic patients with schizophrenia and the control group, with F values of the comparison.

Clinical Control Group effects
Identification (baseline sentences)
Prosody Semantic Prosody Semantic
Target-emotion-present 4.5 (1) 4.8 (0.7) 5.0 (1) 5.5 (0.7)
Target-emotion-absent 2.5 (0.7) 2.5 (0.6) 2.2 (0.7) 2.2 (0.6)
Group X Identification (target-emotion-present vs. target-emotion-absent) F(1, 38) = 12.5, p = 0.001, ηp2 = 0.25
Selective attention
Congruent 5.1 (0.8) 5.3 (0.5) 5.5 (0.8) 5.7 (0.5)
Incongruent 4.7 (0.7) 4.2 (0.7) 5.5 (0.7) 5.5 (0.8)
Group X Selective Attention (congruent vs. incongruent) F(1, 38) = 14.5, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.28
Integration
Congruent sentences 4.9 (0.8) 5.5 (0.8)
Prosodic sentences 3.8 (0.6) 4.5 (0.6)
Semantic sentences 3.0 (0.9) 3.3 (0.9)
Group X Linear trend (congruent > prosodic > semantic) F(1, 38) = 1.0, p =0.32
Target-emotion-present Average 3.9 (0.5) 4.5 (0.5) F(1, 38) = 10.7, p = 0.002, ηp2 = 0.22
Target-emotion-present Anger 3.9 (0.7) 4.9 (0.7) F(1, 38) = 20.9, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.36
Target-emotion-present Sadness 4.0 (0.7) 4.7 (0.8) F(1, 38) = 7.7, p = 0.009, ηp2 = 0.17
Target-emotion-present Happiness 3.8 (0.5) 3.8 (0.6) F(1, 38) = 0.26, p = 0.61
Target-emotion-absent 2.4 (0.6) 2.0 (0.6) F(1, 38) = 3.61 p = 0.065, ηp2 = 0.09