Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;46(6):1341–1350. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01182-6

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics and association between variables of treatment of the infection and protocol

Treatment variable Total (n = 71) Protocol P value Missing
A (n = 39) B (n = 32)
Duration symptoms of infection before treatment 0.146b 0
 < 1 day 13 8 5
 1–7 days 47 28 19
 1–3 weeks 11 3 8
Number of debridements performed 2 (1–22) 2 (1–14) 3 (1–22) 0.209c
Local Antibiotics with debridementd 38 19 19 0.370a 0
Closure after debridement 0
 Primary closure 38 21 17 0.952a
 Secondary closure 24 17 7 0.952a
 Transplantation (flap/skin) 9 1 8 0.009b
 Vacuum therapye 291 12 17 0.057a
 Time to secondary closure after debridement, daysf 59 (6–540) 75 (9–540) 26 (6–214) 0.101c
Antibiotic therapy 0
 Duration i.v. antibiotic therapy 17 (7–116) 10 (7–116) 28 (7–110) 0.000c
 Duration oral antibiotic therapy 57 (0–119) 70 (0–112) 28 (0–119) 0.000c
 Duration total antibiotic therapy 80 (7–202) 81 (7–126) 64 (14–202) 0.235c
 Duration of rifampicin therapy 42 (0–116) 80 (7–116) 0 (0–93) 0.000c

Bold P values are < 0.05 and considered significant

Data are presented as the number of cases or as median with the range in parenthesis

a Pearson Chi-square

bFisher’s exact

cMann–Whitney U-test

dLocal antibiotics consisted of either gentamicin-loaded beads, cement, or bioresorbable films in both protocols and were administered at assessment of the treating physician

eOverlap with secondary closure and skin or flap transplantation

fOutliers in wound closure in both groups were due to small skin defect with diminished wound-healing tendencies. Vacuum or antibiotic therapy was not indicated for the total duration needed for closure