Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;11:6022. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19857-9

Table 2.

Investigation of reaction conditions under oxidant-free systema.

graphic file with name 41467_2020_19857_Figb_HTML.gif
Entry Catalyst Ligand K3PO4 (equiv) Solvent (mL) Yield
1 Ru(dppf)(en)Cl2 2 0.2 22
2 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L1 2 0.2 40
3 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L2 2 0.2 66
4 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 2 0.2 73
5 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 1.5 0.2 66
6 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 2 0.3 71
7 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 2.5 0.3 64
8 Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 2 0.5 70
9b Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L3 2 0.5 74
10b Ru(PNN-1)(PPh3)Cl2 2 0.5 36
11b Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 L4 2 0.5 32
12b Ru(PNN-2)H(CO)Cl2 2 0.5 17
13b Ru-PNP-1 2 0.5 73
14b Ru-PNP-2 2 0.5 74

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.7 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 (5 mol %), ligand (5 mol %), K3PO4, 2-Me-THF at 70 °C under N2 atmosphere. See Supplementary Information (SI) for details. 1H NMR yield was determined using 1,3,5-trimethoxylbenzene as an internal standard. A ‘trace’ amount of product was noted when the desired product was not clearly detected.

b1a (0.6 mmol) was used.