Table 4.
Adjusted multinomial logistic regression for the dietary patterns' associations with socio-demographic variables and access to nutrition services among women (n = 922).
| Variables | Low-mixed vegetarian aOR (95%CI) | Non-vegetarian aOR (95%CI) | High-mixed vegetarian aOR (95%CI) | Calorie-rich aOR (95%CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest | Middle | Highest | Middle | Highest | Middle | Highest | Middle | |
| Age | 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) | 1.01 (0.96, 1.05) | 0.97 (0.91, 1.04) | 0.99 (0.93, 1.05) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) | 0.99 (0.95, 1.04) | 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) | 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) |
| Religion | ||||||||
| Hindu Non-hindu |
1.71 (1.04, 2.80)* Reference |
0.86 (0.57, 1.30) Reference |
3.19 (1.74, 5.83)*** Reference |
2.84 (1.64, 4.92)*** Reference |
0.23 (0.14, 0.38)*** Reference |
0.62 (0.38, 1.01) Reference |
0.83 (0.54, 1.28) Reference |
0.76 (0.49, 1.17) Reference |
| Social class | ||||||||
| Scheduled caste or tribe Other marginalized Non-marginalized |
1.42 (0.79, 2.57) 2.50 (1.42, 4.70)** Reference |
2.22 (1.41, 3.50)** 1.76 (1.08, 2.85)* Reference |
0.93 (0.47, 1.84) 2.24 (1.10, 4.54)* Reference |
0.76 (0.40, 1.46) 1.45 (0.73, 2.86) Reference |
34.59 (16.04, 74.61)*** 15.63 (7.27, 33.59)*** Reference |
0.95 (0.58, 1.56) 0.90 (0.55, 1.49) Reference |
1.06 (0.67, 1.69) 0.94 (0.58, 1.53) Reference |
2.54 (1.55, 4.17)*** 1.90 (1.14, 3.16)* Reference |
| Type of family | ||||||||
| Nuclear Joint |
1.51 (1.00, 2.29) Reference |
0.86 (0.60, 1.22) Reference |
1.29 (0.81, 2.05) Reference |
1.29 (0.85, 1.95) Reference |
0.74 (0.49, 1.11) Reference |
1.16 (0.80, 1.67) Reference |
0.94 (0.66, 1.33) Reference |
0.67 (0.47, 0.97)* Reference |
| Education status of women | ||||||||
| Illiterate and primary school Secondary and high school University degree and above |
1.70 (0.70, 3.65) 1.01 (0.49, 2.07) Reference |
0.90 (0.45, 1.77) 1.15 (0.62, 2.11) Reference |
1.32 (0.55, 3.18) 0.85 (0.38, 1.91) Reference |
1.62 (0.71, 3.69) 1.03 (0.48, 2.23) Reference |
0.22 (0.10, 0.48)*** 0.69 (0.34, 1.41) Reference |
0.73 (0.36,1.45) 0.79 (0.41,1.50) Reference |
0.50 (0.26, 0.98)* 0.83 (0.45, 1.53) Reference |
0.51 (0.26, 1.01) 0.93 (0.49, 1.75) Reference |
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Working Not working |
0.64 (0.31, 1.31) Reference |
0.96 (0.49, 1.86) Reference |
0.71 (0.28, 1.78) Reference |
1.00 (0.49, 2.06) Reference |
2.62 (1.13, 6.05)* Reference |
2.63 (1.22, 5.67)* Reference |
0.98 (0.49, 1.93) Reference |
1.24 (0.64, 2.41) Reference |
| Residential area | ||||||||
| Rural Urban slums |
9.67 (5.80, 16.11)*** Reference |
0.44 (0.28, 0.69)*** Reference |
0.02 (0.01, 0.03)*** Reference |
0.10 (0.06, 0.18)*** Reference |
0.53 (0.34, 0.82)** Reference |
3.21 (2.14, 5.03)*** Reference |
1.64 (1.09, 2.48)* Reference |
0.84 (0.56, 1.26) Reference |
| Socio-economic class | ||||||||
| Lower and upper-lower Middle and above |
0.66 (0.38, 1.14) Reference |
1.39 (0.85, 2.25) Reference |
0.64 (0.33, 1.21) Reference |
0.96 (0.52, 1.78) Reference |
2.04 (1.14, 3.68)* Reference |
0.90 (0.57, 1.45) Reference |
1.22 (0.75, 1.97) Reference |
1.10 (0.68, 1.78) Reference |
| Supplementary food received | ||||||||
| No Yes |
3.26 (2.06, 5.15)*** Reference |
0.92 (0.61, 1.39) Reference |
3.00 (1.80, 5.00)*** Reference |
3.95 (2.51, 6.22)*** Reference |
1.06 (0.68, 1.66) Reference |
0.92 (0.62, 1.37) Reference |
0.83 (0.57, 1.23) Reference |
0.71 (0.47, 1.05) Reference |
| Nutritional advice received | ||||||||
| Yes No |
1.31 (0.84, 2.04) Reference |
1.12 (0.76, 1.65) Reference |
0.84 (0.49, 1.45) Reference |
0.51 (0.31, 0.83)** Reference |
1.90 (1.21, 2.99)** Reference |
1.59 (1.05, 2.40)* Reference |
1.10 (0.74, 1.64) Reference |
1.01 (0.68, 1.52) Reference |
Lowest value category was the reference category; PsuedoR2 for the model of the first factor as a dependent variable was 0.31 (Cox Snell) and 0.35 (Nagelkerke); R2 for the model of the second factor as a dependent variable was 0.41 (Cox Snell) and 0.46 (Nagelkerke); R2 for the model of the third factor as a dependent variable was 0.30(Cox Snell) and 0.34 (Nagalkerke); and R2 for the model of the fourth factor as a dependent variable was 0.06 (Cox Snell) and 0.34 (0.07).
aOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; 95%CI, 95% Confidence Interval.
*
P < 0.05;
**
p < 0.01;
***
p < 0.001.