Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 3;8(4):664–672. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.08.005

Table 3.

Comparison of academic centers and private practices and of geographic regions offering vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, and metoidioplasty

Type of Genital-Affirming Surgery Academic centers (N = 16) Private practice (N = 22) Total (N = 38) West (N = 13) Midwest (N = 7) South (N = 7) Northeast (N = 11) Total (N = 38)
Vaginoplasty 16 19 35 11 6 7 11 35
 Intestinal vaginoplasty 2 5 7 3 1 3 0 7
 Penile inversion vaginoplasty 14 15 29 9 6 7 8 30
 Scrotal skin pedicle flap vaginoplasty 4 8 12 5 2 3 2 12
 Zero-depth vaginoplasty 13 15 28 10 6 7 5 28
 All vaginoplasty techniques 2 4 6 2 1 3 0 6
Phalloplasty 15 15 30 10 5 6 9 30
 Phalloplasty with urethral lengthening 11 13 24 10 4 6 5 25
 Radial forearm flap phalloplasty 11 10 21 9 4 4 5 22
 Anterolateral thigh flap phalloplasty 10 11 21 8 4 3 7 22
 Groin flap phalloplasty 7 9 16 7 3 3 4 17
 All phalloplasty techniques 6 7 13 6 2 2 3 13
Metoidioplasty 10 19 29 12 3 6 7 29

The bold indicates the total number of locations performing vaginoplasty, phalloplasty, metoidioplasty - respectively - including all surgical techniques.