Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;8(4):740–751. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.06.008

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of the retrieved factor mixture model with 3 latent classes

Covariate λ (SE) Very low body image satisfaction class N = 63 (24.71%) M (SE) Average body image satisfaction class N = 111 (43.53%) M (SE) Moderately high body image satisfaction class N = 62 (24.31%) M (SE) Very high body image satisfaction class N = 19 (7.45%) M (SE)
1. I would like to change a good deal about my body. 1.00 (0.00) 1.63 (0.17) 2.87 (0.12) 4.15 (0.16) 5.68 (0.27)
2. By and large, I am satisfied with my looks. 2.67 (0.76)∗∗∗ 1.43 (0.06) 3.38 (0.06) 4.92 (0.07) 6.00 (0.00)
3. I would like to change a good deal about my looks. 1.06 (0.11)∗∗∗ 1.76 (0.17) 3.14 (0.12) 4.33 (0.15) 5.89 (0.07)
4. By and large, I am satisfied with my body. 1.79 (0.32)∗∗∗ 1.41 (0.07) 3.03 (0.08) 4.72 (0.10) 5.89 (0.07)
Continuous latent factor mean - −4.19 (0.58) −1.87 (0.27) 0.00 (0.00) 3.29 (0.55)

Each item of the scale was assessed on a 6-point scale (1 = does not apply at all, 6 = applies exactly).

Negatively worded items were recoded so that higher scores represented higher satisfaction with body image.

Factor loading of the first item was fixed at 1 to set the metric of the continuous latent factor. Significant factor loadings (λ; and standard error values in parenthesis) are indicated by ∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001.

Continuous latent factor mean was fixed at 0 to set the metric of the latent factor.