Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;57:0046958020968776. doi: 10.1177/0046958020968776

Table 1.

Characteristics of Samples and Balance Checking.

Variables (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
All samples (N = 832) Control group (N = 404) Treatment group (N = 428) Differences (3)–(2)
(1) Number of schools 84 42 42 ——
(2) Number of children who need eyeglasses 832 404 428 ——
Children’ characteristics
(3) Gender (1 = male) 0.496 (0.500) 0.520 (0.500) 0.474 (0.500) −0.046 (0.036)
(4) Grade (1 = fifth grade) 0.599 (0.490) 0.601 (0.490) 0.596 (0.491) −0.006 (0.037)
(5) Vision acuity (LogMAR) 0.467 (0.207) 0.450 (0.204) 0.483 (0.209) 0.033* (0.018)
(6) Whether children have known that they need to wear eyeglasses (1 = yes) 0.371 (0.483) 0.372 (0.484) 0.370 (0.483) −0.002 (0.036)
Family characteristics
(7) Both parents migrants (1 = yes) 0.098 (0.298) 0.105 (0.307) 0.092 (0.289) −0.013 (0.022)
(8) One of the parents have high school education (1 = yes) 0.202 (0.402) 0.183 (0.387) 0.220 (0.414) 0.036 (0.033)
(9) Family wealth (indicator) 31767 (34650) 30032 (33572) 33376 (35586) 3344 (5100)
School characteristics
(10) Vision acuity examination in school (1 = yes) 0.601 (0.490) 0.609 (0.489) 0.593 (0.492) −0.015 (0.124)
(11) Vision protection course (1 = yes) 0.762 (0.426) 0.725 (0.447) 0.797 (0.403) 0.071 (0.088)

Note. Data are from the baseline survey.

Standard Deviation adjusted at school level.

*

significant at 10% level.