Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;9(11):3497. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113497

Table 3.

Patients characteristics of the articles.

Authors/Year of Publication No. of Patients Age FEV1 % Pred COPD Stage Duration of Medication Duration of Monitoring
Effective
  Hataji 2013 [42] 23 69.7 64.5 I–IV 4 W 4 W
  Watz 2014 [39] 129 61.4 64 II, III 3 W 1 W
  Minakata 2015 [43] 21 70.7 52.6 I–IV 6 W 2 W
  Watz 2017 [40] 127 vs. 123 62.6 vs. 62.1 60.3 vs. 61.0 II, III 4 W 1 W
  Minakata 2019 [41] 184 72.8 52.6 II, III, IV 6 W 2 W
  Kamei 2019 [44] 22 vs. 22 72.3 vs. 70.9 60.1 vs. 57.6 II, III 8 W 1 W
  Hirano 2019 [45] 14 72.1 55.6 II, III, IV 8 W 2 W
  Tsujimura 2019 [46] 12 71.5 FEV1% 34.5 III, IV 4, 12 W 2 W
Dependent on indicators
  Beeh 2014 [31] 112 60.3 56.7 II–III 3 W 1 W
  Nishijima 2015 [48] 18 74.2 55.2 II, III, IV 12 W 1 W
  Watz 2016 [47] 194 62.8 61.6 I–IV 3 W 1 W
Ineffective
  O’Donnell 2011 [49] 89 62.8 61.2 I, II, III 3 W 5 days
  Troosters 2014 [50] 238 vs. 219 61.2 vs. 62.3 65.6 vs. 65.8 II 24 W 1 W
  Ichinose 2018 [51] 184 72.8 52.6 II, III, IV 6 W 2 W
  Troosters 2018 [52] 65 vs. 67 vs. 72 64.2 vs. 65.4 vs. 64.9 56 vs. 57 vs. 59 I–IV 12 W 1 W

FEV1 % Pred, forced expiratory volume in one second % of predicted; W, week(s).