Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;9(11):1600. doi: 10.3390/foods9111600

Table 3.

Bread texture as affected by wheat flour replacement.

Sample 1 Crust Firmness (N) (n = 32) 2 Crumb Firmness (N) (n = 16) 3 Crumb Cell Density (cells/cm2) (n = 4) 2 Total Cell Area (mm2/100 mm2) (n = 4) 2
Ref 20.87 ± 1.40 b 5.49 ± 1.46 bc 26.31 ± 4.45 b 25.80 ± 3.15 c
10P 22.09 ± 2.81 ab 5.01 ± 0.59 bc 35.97 ± 4.31 a 33.53 ± 2.29 b
10Pc 22.20 ± 3.33 ab 4.81 ± 0.79 c 32.75 ± 5.53 ab 38.18 ± 2.70 a
10Ph 22.57 ± 3.53 ab 6.02 ± 0.88 b 34.92 ± 5.31 a 36.45 ± 2.65 ab
WS 23.51 ± 3.30 a 13.71 ± 3.32 a 26.06 ± 0.39 b 32.98 ± 2.24 b

1 Ref, reference dough/bread; 10P, dough/bread based on 90% wheat flour and 10% pomace; 10Pc, similar to 10P but with pomace soaked in cold water; 10Ph, similar to 10P but with pomace soaked in boiling water; WS, dough/bread of wholegrain spelt flour. 2 Mean values (± standard deviation) in a column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05). 3 Mean values (± standard deviation) in this column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.10).