Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 9;598(22):5091–5108. doi: 10.1113/JP280425

Table 1.

PCR analysis of LTCC‐interacting subunits

AVG Ct ΔCt vs. GAPDH Standard deviation
Control HFpEF Control HFpEF Control HFpEF Fold change 95% CI P value
GAPDH 16.49 16.24 0 0 0 0 1 (1.00, 1.00) 0
a2D‐3 33.73 32.3 17.238 16.053 0.679 2.414 2.272 (0.00001, 5.57) 0.326
a2D‐2 24.33 24 7.839 7.755 0.535 1.575 1.060 (0.41, 1.71) 0.893
a2D‐1 24.27 23.56 7.778 7.321 1.089 1.936 1.373 (0.81, 1.94) 0.148
CaVB2d 25.92 25.41 9.426 9.162 0.685 1.346 1.200 (0.60, 1.80) 0.331
CaVB2c 28.66 28.18 12.172 11.936 0.854 1.442 1.178 (0.69, 1.66) 0.328
CaVB2b 22.36 21.98 5.868 5.738 0.519 1.520 1.094 (0.44, 1.75) 0.903
CaVB2a 35 35 18.509 18.756 0.000 0.000 0.843 (0.00001, 1.74) 0.946
CaVB4 32.46 31.91 15.970 15.664 1.691 1.784 1.237 (0.00001, 3.27) 0.384
CaVB3 26.54 25.36 10.051 9.117 1.799 1.085 1.911 (0.00001, 4.45) 0.406
CaVB2 26.11 26.14 9.618 9.896 1.615 1.488 0.825 (0.26, 1.39) 0.454
CaVB1 31.16 30.06 14.670 13.820 0.973 1.181 1.802 (0.61, 2.99) 0.102