Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 13;11:578419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578419

Table 4.

Results of moderation analysis using PROCESS (Model 1) in Study 2.

Independent variables Corruption (Y)
B SE t LCLI UCLI
Ethical leadership (X) −2.77** 0.68 4.06 −3.90 −1.64
Machiavellianism (W) −0.02 0.14 0.14 −0.25 0.21
X × W 0.33 0.19 1.72 0.01 0.65
F 18.07**
R2 0.27**
Moderator (Machiavellianism) Conditional direct effect of X on Y
B SE t LCLI UCLI
Low −2.07** 0.33 6.20 −2.62 −1.52
Mean −1.66** 0.23 7.05 −2.06 −1.27
High −1.25** 0.33 3.71 −1.81 −0.69

N = 146. LLCI, lower limit confident interval; UCLI, upper limit confidence interval. Ethical leadership were coded 0 = non-ethical leadership and 1 = ethical leadership. We report the bias-corrected and accelerated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using 5,000 bootstrap samples.

p < 0.10;

**

p < 0.01.