Table 7.
Results of moderated mediation analysis using PROCESS (Model 8) in Study 2.
| Independent variables | Intuitive thinking style (M) | Corruption (Y) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | t | LCLI | UCLI | B | SE | t | LCLI | UCLI | |
| Ethical leadership (X) | 0.70 | 0.44 | 1.60 | −0.02 | 1.43 | −2.52** | 0.67 | 3.74 | −3.63 | −1.40 |
| Machiavellianism (W) | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.40 | −0.11 | 0.18 | −0.01 | 0.13 | 0.04 | −0.23 | 0.22 |
| X × W | −0.08 | 0.12 | 0.68 | −0.28 | 0.12 | 0.30 | 0.18 | 1.60 | −0.01 | 0.61 |
| Intuitive thinking style (M) | −0.35** | 0.12 | 2.82 | −0.56 | −0.14 | |||||
| F | 2.73* | 16.21** | ||||||||
| R2 | 0.05* | 0.31** | ||||||||
| Moderator (Machiavellianism) | Conditional indirect effect of X on Y via M | |||||||||
| B | SE | LCLI | UCLI | |||||||
| Low | −0.18 | 0.11 | −0.39 | −0.03 | ||||||
| Mean | −0.15 | 0.07 | −29 | −0.04 | ||||||
| High | −0.11 | 0.08 | −0.26 | 0.01 | ||||||
| Moderated moderation index (0.03) | 0.05 | −0.04 | 0.12 | |||||||
N = 146. LLCI, lower limit confident interval; UCLI, upper limit confidence interval. Ethical leadership were coded 0 = non-ethical leadership and 1 = ethical leadership. We report the bias-corrected and accelerated 90% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using 5,000 bootstrap samples.
*
p < 0.05;
**
p < 0.01.