Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 28;9(11):3467. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113467

Table 3.

Characteristics of the study subjects with aqueous-deficient dry eye and mild meibomian gland dysfunction in intense pulsed light (IPL)-meibomian gland expression (MGX) and MGX (control) groups before as well as 1 and 3 months after the final treatment session.

Characteristic Group Baseline 1 Month after the Final Treatment Session 3 Months after the Final Treatment Session
Mean ± SD Adjusted p Value for IPL-MGX vs. Control Mean ± SD Mean Change ± SE Adjusted p Value vs. Baseline Adjusted p Value for
IPL-MGX vs. Control
Mean ± SD Mean Change ± SE Adjusted p Value vs. Baseline Adjusted p Value for IPL-MGX vs. Control
SPEED score Control 14.2 ± 4.6 0.53 10.1 ± 3.9 −4.2 ± 0.6 <0.001 ** 0.003 * 10.4 ± 4.1 −3.8 ± 0.6 <0.001 ** <0.001 **
(0–28) IPL-MGX 15.9 ± 4.2 6.0 ± 4.6 −9.9 ± 0.7 <0.001 ** 4.2 ± 3.9 −11.7 ± 0.9 <0.001 **
LLT Control 63.1 ± 16.2 0.72 56.1 ± 11.2 −7.0 ± 2.6 0.055 <0.001 ** 57.9 ± 11.8 −5.2 ± 2.7 0.14 <0.001 **
(nm) IPL-MGX 66.6 ± 24.1 78.6 ± 21.5 14.7 ± 3.2 <0.001 ** 84.2 ± 20.6 18.3 ± 2.9 <0.001 **
Plugging Control 1.0 ± 0.2 0.88 0.8 ± 0.4 −0.3 ± 0.1 0.002 * <0.001 ** 1.1 ± 0.3 0.1 ± 0.1 0.37 <0.001 **
(0–3) IPL-MGX 1.0 ± 0.0 0.3 ± 0.4 −0.7 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** 0.3 ± 0.5 −0.7 ± 0.1 <0.001 **
Vascularity Control 1.7 ± 0.6 0.85 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 1 <0.001 ** 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 1 <0.001 **
(0–3) IPL-MGX 1.9 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.7 −1.1 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** 0.9 ± 0.7 −1.0 ± 0.1 <0.001 **
Meiboscore Control 1.7 ± 0.6 0.69 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 1 0.32 1.7 ± 0.6 0.0 ± 0.0 1 0.69
(0–6) IPL-MGX 1.5 ± 1.0 1.5 ± 1.0 −0.1 ± 0.0 0.088 1.5 ± 1.0 0.0 ± 0.0 1
Meibum grade Control 2.0 ± 0.0 1 1.6 ± 0.5 −0.4 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** <0.001 ** 1.9 ± 0.4 −0.2 ± 0.1 0.025 * <0.001 **
(0–3) IPL-MGX 2.0 ± 0.0 0.5 ± 0.6 −1.5 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** 0.4 ± 0.6 −1.6 ± 0.1 <0.001 **
NIBUT Control 2.2 ± 1.1 1 3.6 ± 1.6 1.4 ± 0.2 <0.001 ** 0.002 * 2.4 ± 1.2 0.2 ± 0.1 0.22 <0.001 **
(s) IPL-MGX 2.1 ± 1.3 5.3 ± 2.2 3.2 ± 0.3 <0.001 ** 5.5 ± 2.0 3.4 ± 0.3 <0.001 **
FBUT Control 2.4 ± 1.1 0.84 3.4 ± 1.5 1.1 ± 0.2 <0.001 ** 0.001 * 2.5 ± 1.3 0.1 ± 0.1 0.17 <0.001 **
(s) IPL-MGX 2.2 ± 1.3 5.2 ± 2.0 3.0 ± 0.4 <0.001 ** 5.4 ± 2.1 3.2 ± 0.4 <0.001 **
Fluo score Control 3.2 ± 0.8 0.75 2.7 ± 0.9 −0.5 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** <0.001 ** 2.9 ± 0.9 −0.3 ± 0.1 <0.001 ** <0.001 **
(0–9) IPL-MGX 3.4 ± 2.2 0.5 ± 0.9 −3.0 ± 0.3 <0.001 ** 0.3 ± 0.6 −3.1 ± 0.3 <0.001 **
Schirmer’s test value Control 2.4 ± 1.5 1 2.4 ± 1.5 0.0 ± 0.2 1 1 2.5 ± 1.4 0.1 ± 0.1 1 0.89
(mm) IPL-MGX 2.3 ± 1.5 2.2 ± 1.4 −0.1 ± 0.2 1 2.2 ± 1.4 −0.1 ± 0.1 0.84

SPEED score: control group (n = 20); IPL-MGX group (n = 23). Other characteristics: control group (n = 40 eyes); IPL-MGX group (n = 46 eyes). p values were determined with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test vs. baseline or Mann–Whitney U test vs. control with Bonferroni’s correction (* adjusted p < 0.05, ** adjusted p < 0.001). SPEED, standard patient evaluation of eye dryness; LLT, lipid layer thickness; NIBUT, noninvasive breakup time; FUBT, fluorescein breakup time; Fluo, fluorescein staining; SE, standard errors; SD, standard deviations.