Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 11;10:587420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.587420

Table 3.

Meta results for the association between HIF-1α expression and endometrial cancer.

Characteristics (Negative vs Positive) Studies Pooled OR (95% CI) P Heterogeneity Begg’s test Egger’s test
I2 (%) P Z P T P
Risk (Overall) 9 15.79 (8.44, 29.52) <0.05 50.50% 0.04 1.15 0.25 0.99 0.36
Risk (Asian) 8 14.08 (7.82, 25.35) <0.05 45.30% 0.08 0.37 0.71 0.38 0.72
Tumor grade (Overall) (G1 vs G2, G3) 15 1.78 (0.97, 3.26) >0.05 74.70% 0.00 0.99 0.32 -0.57 0.58
Tumor grade (Caucasian) (G1 vs G2, G3) 4 3.09 (1.63, 5.85) <0.05 14.10% 0.32 0.31 0.75 -0.38 0.47
Tumor grade (Asian) (G1 vs G2, G3) 9 1.21 (0.50, 2.91) <0.05 80.30% 0.00 1.70 0.09 -6.09 0.03
Lymph node metastasis (Overall) (N0 vs N1) 12 3.25 (1.78, 5.92) <0.05 63.00% 0.00 1.99 0.05 2.64 0.03
Lymph node metastasis (Caucasian) (N0 vs N1) 2 1.42 (0.79, 2.56) >0.05 38.70% 0.20 0.00 1.00
Lymph node metastasis (Asian) (N0 vs N1) 8 3.99 (1.84, 8.65) <0.05 59.00% 0.02 2.10 0.04 1.08 0.32
TNM stage (Overall) (T1 vs T2-T4) 13 1.46 (0.91, 2.35) >0.05 62.80% 0.00 1.53 0.13 2.01 0.07
TNM stage (Caucasian) (T1 vs T2-T4) 7 1.35 (0.67, 2.70)) >0.05 74.10% 0.00 1.20 0.23 1.45 0.21
TNM stage (Asian) (T1 vs T2-T4) 5 1.27 (0.76, 2.13) >0.05 6.40% 6.40 0.73 0.46 1.02 0.38
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) 8 2.88 (0.89, 8.03) >0.05 88.90% 0.00 0.87 0.39 1.11 0.31
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) (Caucasians) 3 3.38 (0.50, 22.77) >0.05 95.00% 0.00 1.04 0.30 2.55 0.24
FIGO ((Ⅰ+Ⅱ) vs (Ⅲ+Ⅳ)) (Asians) 4 2.38 (0.35, 16.02) >0.05 85.50% 0.00 -0.34 1.00 -0.33 0.77
Myometrial invasion (<50% vs >50%) 11 2.26 (1.70, 3.01) <0.05 39.70% 0.08 1.71 0.09 2.81 0.02
Myometrial invasion (Caucasian) (<50% vs >50%) 3 1.18 (0.75, 1.86) >0.05 0.00% 0.93 1.04 0.30 7.14 0.09
Myometrial invasion (Asian) (<50% vs >50%) 6 3.30 (2.15, 5.08) <0.05 0.00% 0.55 0.75 0.45 1.26 0.28
PR 3 1.59 (0.29, 8.69) >0.05 91.10% 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.80 0.32
ER 3 0.92 (0.28, 3.03) >0.05 79.40% 0.01 1.04 0.30 1.93 0.30
Recurrence 3 2.71 (0.74,9.99) >0.05 73.00% 0.03 1.04 0.30 21.95 0.03
Type1 vs Type2 4 1.38 (0.19, 9.84) >0.05 93.70% 0.00 -0.34 1.00 -0.03 0.98
Pooled HR (95% CI)
OS 6 2.29 (1.68, 2.90) <0.05 0% 0.613 0.38 0.707 0.06 0.955
OS in Caucasians 4 2.07 (1.41, 2.73) <0.05 0% 0.92 0.34 0.734 0.05 0.964
OS in Asians 1 3.79 (2.18, 6.35) <0.05

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.