Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 31;9(11):3527. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113527

Table 8.

OPLS of PPT over erector spinae in FM. Regressors used data from microdialysis and spectroscopy of this muscle (except pain variables from microdialysis) (cf. Table 3 and Table 4). The regression had one predictive component. Only significant variables are shown (i.e., variables with VIP > 1.0 and absolute p(corr) ≥ 0.50).

Variables VIP p(corr)
Pi/PCr 1.73 −0.69
Pi/Ptot 1.58 −0.63
Mean Glycerol Erector spinae 140–220 min 1.52 −0.60
Glycerol Erector spinae 140 min 1.51 −0.60
Pyruvate Erector spinae 140 min 1.46 −0.58
Difference Blood flow Erector spinae 160 min–140 min 1.44 −0.57
Blood flow Erector spinae 140 min 1.41 0.56
Lactate Erector spinae 140 min 1.38 −0.54
PCr/Ptot 1.36 0.54
R2 0.32
Q2 0.24
CV-ANOVA P-value 0.020
n 31

VIP and p(corr) are reported for each regressor (i.e., the loading of each variable scaled as a correlation coefficient and therefore standardizing the range from −1 to + 1). The sign of p(corr) indicates the direction of the correlation with the dependent variable (+ = positive correlation; − = negative correlation). Hence, a positive p(corr) for a certain variable indicates a positive correlation with PPT of erector spinae in FM in the multivariate context. The four bottom rows report R2, Q2, P-value of the CV-ANOVA, and number of subjects included in the regression (n) from the OPLS regression (see Statistics for details).