Table 3.
Model 1: Fat Intake (10 g/d Increase) 2 | ||||||
Weight (kg) 3 | BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
Coefficient | 95% CI 4 | p value | Coefficient | 95% CI | p value | |
Average | 0.030 | 0.018–0.041 | <0.0001 | 0.011 | 0.007–0.016 | <0.0001 |
Men | 0.023 | 0.006–0.041 | 0.0080 | 0.009 | 0.003–0.015 | 0.0050 |
Women | 0.033 | 0.018–0.049 | <0.0001 | 0.014 | 0.007–0.020 | <0.0001 |
Model 2: % energy intake from fat (10% per day increase) | ||||||
Weight (kg) 3 | BMI (kg/m2) | |||||
Coefficient | 95% CI | p value | Coefficient | 95% CI | p value | |
Average | 0.092 | 0.051–0.133 | <0.0001 | 0.038 | 0.022–0.054 | <0.0001 |
Men | 0.092 | 0.027–0.157 | 0.0060 | 0.035 | 0.012–0.058 | 0.0030 |
Women | 0.098 | 0.045–0.150 | <0.0001 | 0.041 | 0.020–0.063 | <0.0001 |
Model 3: High-fat diet (energy intake from fat > 30%) 5 | ||||||
Overweight and obesity | RR 6 | 95% CI | p value | |||
Average | 1.13 | 1.04–1.23 | 0.003 | |||
Men | 1.14 | 1.01–1.29 | 0.032 | |||
Women | 1.13 | 1.01–1.26 | 0.031 |
1 Adjusted for age, sex, physical activity tertiles, income tertiles, residency, smoking status, drinking status, and survey year. 2 Additionally adjusted for total nonfat energy. 3 Additionally adjusted for height. 4 95% confidence interval (CI). 5 Additionally adjusted for total fat intake. 6 Relative risk (RR). Model 1: Association of fat intake (10 g/d increase) with body weight and Body Mass Index (BMI). Random-effects linear regression models were used. Model 2: Association of percentage of energy intake from fat (10% per day increase) with body weight and BMI. Random-effects linear regression models were used. Model 3: Association between a high-fat diet (energy intake from fat > 30%) and the risk of overweight and obesity. Random-effects logistic regression models were used.