Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 2;34(6):2242–2252. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15914

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Upper limits of 95% PIs of, A, LVDd and, B, LVDs as a function of body weight in the all nonsighthound group generated using a GAM (red line, n = 6097) and predicted values using the formulas provided in the study by Cornell et al 5 (blue line, n = 494). The upper limit of the 95% PI was slightly lower in our study compared to the upper PI limit provided by Cornell et al. GAM, generalized additive model; LVDd, left ventricular diameter in diastole; LVDs, left ventricular diameter in systole; PI, prediction interval

[Correction added on October 22, 2020 after first online publication: Figure 2 “Upper limits of 95% PIs of, A, LVDd and, B, LVDs as a function of body weight in the all non‐sighthound group generated using a Q7 GAM (red line, n = 6097) and predicted values using the formulas provided in the study by Cornell et al5 (blue line, n = 494)” LVDd and LVDs upper PI limit graph lines corrected.]