Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 7;12(11):3295. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113295

Table 2.

Results of univariate analyses for liver cirrhosis risk in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Variable n (%) OR 95% CI p-Value
Age
>50 years
≤50 years
346 (53%)
306 (47%)
4.19 2.71–6.48 <0.001
Sex
Female
Male
242 (37%)
410 (63%)
1.59 1.07–2.36 0.021
Alcohol consumption
YES
NO
332 (51%)
320 (49%)
2.37 1.58–3.55 <0.001
Previous treatment
YES
NO
308 (47%)
344 (53%)
2.64 1.73–4.02 <0.001
Portal hypertension
YES
NO
254 (39%)
398 (61%)
515 71–3756 <0.001
AST
>50 IU/L
≤50 IU/L
118(18%)
534 (82%)
3.10 1.76–58.44 <0.001
ALT
>42 IU/L
≤42 IU/L
98 (15%)
554 (85%)
1.22 0.80–1.84 0.34
PLT
>150 IU/L
≤150 IU/L
502 (77%)
150 (23%)
4.96 3.18–7.73 <0.001
HBV DNA
>6000 kIU/mL
≤6000 kIU/ml
529 (81%)
123 (19%)
3.75 1.70–8.26 0.001
AST/ALT
>1
≤1
254 (39%)
398 (61%)
1.73 1.18–2.53 0.004
XRCC1 rs25487
CC vs. TT 294 (74%) vs. 104 (26%) 1.58 0.95–2.60 0.069
CC vs. CT, TT 294 (45%) vs. 358 (55%) 0.61 0.42–0.89 0.012
TT vs. CT, CC 104 (16%) vs. 548 (84%) 1.03 0.63–1.70 0.89
ERCC2 rs238406
GG vs. TT 235 (60.5%) vs. 154 (39.5%) 1.58 0.91–2.72 0.099
GG vs. GT, TT 235 (36%) vs. 417 (64%) 1.14 0.75–1.73 0.54
TT vs. GT, GG 154 (23.5%) vs. 498 (76.5%) 0.53 0.30–0.92 0.025
ERCC2 rs13181
TT vs. GG 303 (72%) vs. 117 (28%) 4.27 1.11–16.42 0.034
GG vs. GT, TT 117 (18%) vs. 535 (82%) 1.35 0.86–2.14 0.19
TT vs. GT, GG 303 (46.5%) vs. 349 (53.5%) 0.91 0.63–1.33 0.64
ERCC5 rs2018836
GG vs. AA 333 (79%) vs. 88 (21%) 1.28 0.77–2.12 0.33
GG vs. GA, AA 333 (51%) vs. 319 (49%) 1.41 0.86–2.30 0.17
AA vs. GA, GG 88 (13.5%) vs. 564 (86.5%) 0.92 0.61–1.32 0.65
RAD 52 rs7963551
TT vs. GG 492 (87%) vs. 72 (13%) 1.04 0.80–1.25 0.97
TT vs. TG, GG 492 (75.5%) vs. 160 (24.5%) 0.97 0.61–1.54 0.91
GG vs. TG, TT 72 (11%) vs. 580 (89%) 0.96 0.51–1.81 0.90
MRE 11 rs496797
TT vs. CC 163 (44%) vs. 209 (56%) 0.67 0.42–1.09 0.11
TT vs. TC, CC 163 (25%) vs. 489 (75%) 1.17 0.78–1.76 0.44
CC vs. TC, TT 209 (32%) vs. 443 (68%) 0.68 0.45–1.003 0.067
MRE 11 rs535801
CC vs. TT 316 (77%) vs. 95 (23%) 1.10 0.67–1.82 0.70
CC vs. CT, TT 316 (48.5%) vs. 336 (51.5%) 1.04 0.72–1.50 0.84
TT vs. CT, CC 95 (14.5%) vs. 557 (85.5%) 1.30 0.80–2.10 0.29
NBN rs2735383
CC vs. GG 336 (77%) vs. 101 (23%) 0.59 0.35–1.01 0.056
CC vs. CG, GG 336 (51.5%) vs. 316 (48.5%) 1.29 0.88–1.89 0.18
GG vs. CG, CC 101 (15.5%) vs. 551 (84.5%) 0.53 0.29–0.98 0.042
XRCC4 rs1805377
GG vs. AA 522 (97.5%) vs. 13 (2.5%) 1.51 0.71–3.21 0.28
GG vs. GA, AA 522 (80%) vs. 130 (20%) 0.85 0.54–1.32 0.46
AA vs. GA, GG 13 (2%) vs. 639 (98%) 2.15 7.44–6.22 0.16

p-values less than 0.05 are marked in bold. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.