Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 7;10(11):910. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10110910

Table 2.

Pairwise comparison of ROC curve for classification of six different types of DISs in the testing dataset.

Difference between Areas SE 95% CI p-Value
Panoramic and periapical images
vs. oeriapical images
0.007 0.007 −0.008–0.022 0.365
Panoramic and periapical images
vs. panoramic images
0.025 0.021 −0.016–0.067 0.235
Panoramic images
vs. oeriapical images
0.032 0.020 −0.006–0.072 0.106

AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; AUCs were compared using DeLong’s method for paired ROC curves; panoramic and periapical images, dataset consisting of 2396 panoramic and periapical radiographic images; panoramic images, dataset consisting of 1429 panoramic radiographic images; periapical images, dataset consisting of 967 periapical radiographic images.