Table 2.
Performance and modification comparison of substrate modifications for wastewater treatment
| Substrate | Modifying Method/Agent | Application | Retention (%) | Flux (LMH) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FO mode | |||||
| PSf nanofiber | Electrospinning | Antibiotic wastewater | Antibiotics: 98.1–99.7 | 48.98 | [43] |
| PSf flat sheet | 5 % SPEEK | High salinity wastewater | NaCl: 96.1 |
28.3 | [160] |
| PSf flat sheet | 4% PEG 400 | Synthetic, industrial wastewater | Pb2+, Cd2+, Cr2+: 99.9, 99.7, 98.3 |
34.4 | [159] |
| 20.4 wt % PESU 18 wt % Matrimid 15 wt % sPPSU |
- | Organic pollutant wastewater | Aniline, phenol, nitrobenzene 91.8, 73.7, 76.8 88.4, 75.9, 76.6 91.5, 72.1, 75.2 |
20.6, 14.1, 22.1 |
[161] |
| SPES flat sheet | PVP PEG glycerol |
Domestic wastewater | NH4+, PO43-, TOC: 56.31, 93.7, 93.01 59.06, 98.1, 97.01 58.22, 96.0, 97.48 |
38.18 35.08 33.58 |
[79] |
| PES flat sheet | Double-skinned/ zwitterionic brush | Oily wastewater | Oil: 99.0 | 13.7 | [189] |
| PES flat sheet | Coating/PDA/SWCNT interlayer | Salinity gradient recovery | BSA: 98.0 | 18.1 | [31] |